[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ahh, I did not see what your previous comment meant. Caught out by this
> damn ML reply-to setting again.
> 
> I'm subscribed to several lists which operate in a more logical way: I
> get a msg from the list , I hit "reply" in my email client and it
> replies to the list.
> 
> Since the msg came from the ml not from your address the reply-to header
> is counter intuitive.

It actually isn't. You may want to read this:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html


Kind regards,

Mukund


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Reply via email to