On 6/23/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:26 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I think "nearest neighbour" is non technical, very obvious in it's meaning
> > and readily understood.
> IMO it is very technical and the vast majority of users does not
> understand its meaning. They also don't understand Linear or Cubic for
> that matter, but it's difficult to come up with simpler terms.

Well, we could consider naming it in a slightly longer way but one
that may be more suggestive to the ordinary user ---

1-factor (nearest neighbour)
2-factor (linear)
3-factor (cubic)
5-factor (lanczos3) -- is this number correct?

So it would be a fairly simple and common pattern to see -- more
factors taken into consideration -> more quality, more time.
Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to