On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Martin Nordholts <ense...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I have been working on implementing the Save + export spec  for a while. > Since it will affect the workflow for basically everyone it would be nice > with getting some testing and comments before we finalize, merge and push to > GNOME master. The patches are attached to the bug report > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581655 . Quick-guide to apply and > test: > > cd ~/source/gimp > tar -zxvf save-plus-export-2009-05-06.tar.gz > git checkout -b save-plus-export-2009-05-06 master > git am save-plus-export-2009-05-06/* > > this will create and switch to a new branch based on top of your local > master branch, and apply the patches to that branch. Then you build and > install as usual.
This doesn't seem to work -- patch #0010 fails: " Applying app: Add an 'export' mode to the file save dialog error: patch failed: app/dialogs/file-save-dialog.c:138 error: app/dialogs/file-save-dialog.c: patch does not apply Patch failed at 0010. " The patch appears to be offset by about 10 lines. I applied it manually, and then ran git-am --skip Patch 0011 applied ok, Patch 0012 had problems: "Applying app: Improve save and export error messages error: app/dialogs/file-save-dialog.c: does not match index Patch failed at 0012." Applied that manually, Patches 013..017 applied OK. 018 says : "Applying app: Remember last export URI for each image error: app/dialogs/file-save-dialog.c: does not match index error: patch failed: app/file/gimp-file.h:27 error: app/file/gimp-file.h: patch does not apply Patch failed at 0018. " Done manually, 019 fails similarly, done manually, same for 020, 021 022 applied ok. It's possible that I didn't understand how to 'resolve' a problem ( now I think it is, apply the patch manually, 'git add' the relevant files, and 'git am --resolved') I'm now trying to build it.. Trying it out.. This works REALLY well! I <3 it! It behaves much more comfortably than the old setup, I anticipate no longer needing to awkwardly 'save copy' so frequently simply to get a web-usable version of the image. I like how, if I hit 'revert', it properly reverts to the source image (eg 12.gif rather than the working document 12.xcf) I was confused by how 'export to foo.png' was only usable once the image became dirty (ie. I changed it ). If that is considered appropriate behaviour, then your ability to 'save' should also depend on the dirtiness of the image David _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer