He's right here =>>
"I'm using the export function. Each time I then
press ctrl+E, I'm overwriting that file again and again, without even a
prompt. I don't see a meaningful difference between this workflow, and
that of importing/editing/exporting."
He doesn't know that Ctrl + Shift + E bring to you the Export Dialog
where you can choose your different filename AND / OR different
2011/6/26 Jeremy Morton <ad...@game-point.net>:
> The way I think of the workflow, I'm importing a file, editing it, and
> exporting it. Overwriting the file on disk is a mere side-effect of
> that workflow, and GIMP will prompt me in any case just in case I don't
> want to overwrite the file.
> The thing is, if I go about it a different way and export another file
> to overwrite that file, I'm using the export function. Each time I then
> press ctrl+E, I'm overwriting that file again and again, without even a
> prompt. I don't see a meaningful difference between this workflow, and
> that of importing/editing/exporting.
> Best regards,
> Jeremy Morton (Jez)
> On 26/06/2011 15:14, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Jeremy Morton wrote:
>>> As far as I can tell the usage pattern has already changed heavily from
>>> 2.6. In 2.6 there was only one save option; now there's a save and
>>> export. You've already changed that significantly.
>> Yes, and there should be a better reason for going half the way back
>> and introducing a crossbreed of 2.6 and 2.8 than just " it should be
>> possible". I wouldn't really want to rely on arguments like "it
>> doesn't make any sense", but in truth it's exactly what I think.
>> "Overwrite" says exactly what it does. You can assign a shortcut to
>> Alexandre Prokoudine
>> Gimp-developer mailing list
> Gimp-developer mailing list
Nemes Ioan Sorin
Gimp-developer mailing list