On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 10:50:55AM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not yet convinced that this goal is worth all the hassle. What do > other people on this list think about this? Being able to add plug-ins with i18n support is _extremely_ important. Unless the release would be delayed it should be given priority. Remember that gimp-1.2 will be there to stay for a long time, presumably. If the obvious problems with that solution is fixed (rc-format...), it looks feasible to me. Especially since the original "solution" to the i18n problems "officially" has the status of an imperfect hack. -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |
- PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Manish Singh
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Glyph Lefkowitz
- PROPOSAL: New i18n solution (2nd try) Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Marc Lehmann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Jon A. Cruz
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solut... Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solut... Sven Neumann