On Sunday 08 July 2007 12:07:55 Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 07:48 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > I just want to make clear that people who are accustomed to be positively
> > helpful deserve encouragement and others, not of that disposition, IMHO
> > contribute more to this worlld when they remain silent.
> I just tried to help you by pointing out that gimpshop is a different
> application and that you should try to get support for it from the
> people who did the fork. If you did that you might have found out that
> there is no such support. You might then reconsider your decision, but
> that is of course completely up to you.
Am I not correct in saying that gimpshop a tool using gimp? Judging by the
helpful replies I have received gimpshop is also of considerable interest to
many users of gimp who use this list.
It might be considerably improved by a being better supported by those who
are advocates of gimp.
I rather gather there are those who disparage gimpshop and wish it to fail and
those who wish it to succeed but are afraid of offending some members of the
Maybe gimp could benefit from a more catholic and generous approach being
espoused by everyone.
IMHO the gimp community could benefit from the offer of an interface that more
closely resembles photoshop. How that might be achieved maybe another matter.
Your encouragement of all alternatives might lead to a wider adoption and
respect for gimp. While I am sure you were not ill intentioned IMHO the tone
of response did not make me feel welcomed or helped and I have reason for
believing I am not the only one to have reached such a conclusion.
Gimp-user mailing list