Spencer's overall position seems to be summed up here: http://www.globalwarming.org/node/1880
# Heartland slide show here: http://www.warwickhughes.com/agri/Recent-Evidence-Reduced-Sensitivity-NYC-3-4-08.ppt # Audio here: http://www.heartland.org/newyork08/audio/Tuesday/spencer.mp3 Papers serving as the basis for his claims: # Cloud and radiation budget changes associated with tropical intraseasonal oscillations (Spencer et al, 2007) http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007/2007GL029698.shtml # Potential Biases in Feedback Diagnosis from Observational Data: A Simple Model Demonstration (Spencer and Braswell, pending) http://www.weatherquestions.com/Potential_Biases_In_Cloud_Feedback_Diagnosis.doc It's basically a renewed claim of Lindzen's iris and low sensitivity. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
