On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 11:19:13AM -0400, Kenneth E. Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 11:06, Michael O'Donnell wrote:
> > You're such losers - anybody can see that the
> > vi-versus-emacs flamewar is by FAR superior to
> > the Linux-distro one...
>
> I'm not a big fan of the 5 editor. And eMacs, well, isn't that Apple's
> version of a networked toilet-seat looking laptop?? ;-)
Actually, "vi" would be 6 (so says me, Robert John Bell IV). Now
"vim", OTOH, well, I'm not sure that's legitimate Roman numerals, but if
I had to treat it as such, I suppose I'd call it 994 (that's 0x3E2,
01742, or 1111100010 for those of you who have been behind a keyboard
too long).
And yes, there really was no point to this email...
--
Bob Bell Hewlett-Packard Company
Software Engineer 110 Spit Brook Rd - ZKO3-3/U14
TruCluster Group Nashua, NH 03062-2698
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 603-884-0595
*****************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body.
*****************************************************************
