One of the things that would be funny if it weren't so sad is that the
activists within the organization are not even employees of Mozilla
Corporation. They are a handful (I know of exactly 4, there could be a
few more) of employees of the Mozilla Foundation, which is a different
entity, and Brendan was definitely not their CEO.

I believe that Mozilla should continue as an organization that advocates
Freedom of Speech, Privacy and Education, as it was before the crisis
started. I believe that we need a statement along these lines.

Cheers,
 David

On 4/8/14 11:23 AM, Dennis Culley wrote:
> Reuben,
>  
> Well said. The employees need to understand that they are responsible for 
> protecting the brand names no matter what part of the domain they belong to.
>  
> Brendan did not connect his personal views with Mozilla. That was 
> accomplished by activist with a clear intent to punish him and the 
> corporation, if it continued to support him. What is amazing to me is that 
> some of these activists appear to be within the organization itself.  Why 
> that is allowed to happen is a mystery to me.
>  
> The damage has been done. It appears to me the choice is to continue the 
> status quo where Mozilla exists as an advocacy organization or come out with 
> a strong statement of inclusion and respect for all employee personal 
> viewpoints. The former implies that Mozilla will accept alienating a large 
> number of its customers, which most people would consider bad business 
> practice. The latter will require courage in pushing back against extremist 
> social manipulation of the company culture. Regardless of what many insiders 
> would like to think the rest of the world does not live inside what appears 
> to be their own cultural bubble.
>  
> Dennis


-- 
David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD
 Performance Team, Mozilla
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to