Yes well that is a very good point Liz. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Dodd Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2005 1:59 PM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Ads
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:26, Cedric Meyerowitz wrote: > Correct Liz but from my point of view it is the same as no ads. > > The occasional box here and there is of no concern to me if it does not > interfere with my workflow. > > ---------------------------------------------- > > A lot of GP's out there don't mind the Ads in MD2 either as it doesn't > interfere with there work flow (or so they think). When I still used MD2 I > didn't mind the ads. However, once one has used a package without ads, > then you realise how much the ads slows you down. The answer to the > question is Yes, it has Ads. > > Cedric I found it amazing how much they influenced my product choice - well, that's why they were put there. I find I make better product choices. I search MIMS or ADH now for ideas for a drug when I can't recall a name. Liz -- <Overfiend> we're calling 2.2 _POTATO_?? _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
