Greg Twyford wrote:
Maybe I should have said Southern Sydney to be more precise about the
relative bulk-billing rate, but my comment about luxury referred to the
monopoly position at Dorrigo, where I'm sure Dr Bateman isn't represented.
What is your electorate's bulk-billing rate? More like Elizabeth's 59%
than our 95%? Our 5% are truly prepared to go against the flow.
i don't have any idea; i think the answer here is to do a good job and
charge what you feel is appropriate
i admit i am not the owner / principal, but i have come to agree with
the idea that everyone should pay (even if it is $2 above m*c*), and
then let them claim from the hic
b*b* is for the very rare charity case, because i made a decision to get
paid somewhat for working, until the government decrees that i am a
charity with all the tax benefits that ensures; i am very reticent to
have the wasteful sloths in power declare that i should be benevolent
using my potential income rather than their potential expenditure
it's the 95% that accept the status quo that prevent the <gag filter on>
paradigm shift <gag filter off> that is required to make the general
public aware that medical care isn't free, even if their sum outgoing is
zero - handing over money has a very real educational purpose on the
real minimal value of the service
each to their own
ash
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
