Andre Duszynski wrote:
Simon says:
the task of migrating practices and
supporting dozens of extra combinations (SQL flavour x
clinical software version) would be huge and the payoff to
the vendors negligible.
Regards,
Simon
----------
Paraphrasing Lance Armstrong - it's not about the vendors.
Andre.
Andre,
I beg to differ, it is about the vendors. Lock-in and absence of data
migration standards are very much about vendor interests.
I constantly have doubts because we are supporting such commercial
interests, no matter what we do.
Greg
--
Greg Twyford
Information Management & Technology Program Officer
Canterbury Division of General Practice
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph.: 02 9787 9033
Fax: 02 9787 9200
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
***********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files,
including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited
from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended
recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is
prohibited.
All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
