> With respect to CSS, if you Google around you can find lots > of resources like this: http://www.quirksmode.org - which > contains a wealth of information on CSS and Javascript > differences between browsers. A glance at > http://www.quirksmode.org/css/contents.html makes it clear > that CSS standards conformance is not a simple binary issue - > but IE6 and earlier were definitely worse than all other browsers. > > Summary DOM compatibility table: > http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/compatibility.html > > And so on. It is complex and arcane stuff, alas. > > Tim C > ----------
Yup, www.quirksmode.org is *the* resource for cross-browser compatibility. Still you'll always come across instances whereby all the CSS hacks in the world will not get you out of a bind (in respect to displaying 'properly' on IE), or the effort to support IE is all too much. Maybe it't time to use the old "this site is best viewed on a W3C-standards based browser, please visit mozilla.org" pop-up... Andre. PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you receive this e-mail by mistake please notify us ASAP, and then delete this email (and any attachments). We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause. Any views expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the Adelaide Western General Practice Network. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
