> 
> On Monday 04 June 2007, Oliver Frank wrote:
> > > And so on. It is complex and arcane stuff, alas.
> >
> > So is the short answer to my question that Internet 
> Explorer does not 
> > conform to international standards for Web browsers?
> 
> Yes. That was always it's main criticism (it's numerous grave 
> security flaws set aside).
> 
> Horst
>
----------

Eeek, I had hoped that the ever faithful Firefox (2.0.0.4) would pass
the Acid Test; http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/

Alas no!?!

Andre.

PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential.  It 
is intended solely for the addressee.  If you receive this e-mail by mistake 
please notify us ASAP, and then delete this email (and any attachments).  We 
apologise for any inconvenience this may cause.  Any views expressed in this 
message are solely those of the individual sender, except where the sender 
specifically states them to be the views of the Adelaide Western General 
Practice Network. 

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to