> it is quite natural for the people who are socially, racially, politically and economically enjoying the rights within the constitutional framework to uphold the 'holiness' of the constitution.
Isn't it obvious that the socially, racially, politically and economically disadvantaged require the protections offered by the Constitution more than the well off? That should have been a no-brainer. Best regards, Murali. On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:13 PM, salimtk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don't want to hear. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
