Hi Ricardo, Ricardo Wurmus <[email protected]> writes:
> Dear Guix maintainers, > > it is important for the community to see a response by the maintainer > collective to this email. It is bad news if the CoC isn't actually > enforced. Especially in light of the minimal noncommittal response of > the maintainers to the LLM situation this casts a bad light on the > project. I can tell you that the currently active co-maintainers (Tobias, Efraim and myself) still take CoC enforcement and the well-being of our community seriously. We've had gaps and inexcusable delays in the summer, but things should be back to normal now. About the LLM situation, we're considering the addition of a trivial non-LLM policy to the contribution guidelines of the manual. It feels a bit off that this policy decision would come from the co-maintainers after going through a consensus-driven process (GCD 008), but at the same time the co-maintainers are the ones to withhold the "the project’s commitment to be released under a copyleft free software license (GPLv3+) and to follow the Free System Distribution Guideline (FSDG)" [0]. [0] https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2019/gnu-guix-maintainer-collective-expands/ -- Thanks, Maxim
