he is just having his problem with fire fox when IE is working. that was the 
point I was trying to make

Juan Gonzalez
Need training at an affordable price? 
Visit www.BlindAccessTraining.com to learn how to use Window-eyes, JAWS, and 
NVDA. 
You can also learn how to make your own web site when you click on the web 
design link. 


From: net bat 
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 6:53 PM
To: Juan Gonzalez 
Subject: Re: A bit of a rant (was Re: Observations with Window Eyes and Web 
Browsing)


yeah, but without a browse mode rewrite which has been promised for 3 years no 
browser will work right.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Juan Gonzalez 
  To: Jacob Schmude ; GW-Micro 
  Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 8:47 PM
  Subject: Re: A bit of a rant (was Re: Observations with Window Eyes and Web 
Browsing)


  I know that I will regret this, but you need to stop and think about what you 
are saying. lets take apple as an example. there voice over only provides 
speech for one browser. you have no choices. GW and other windows screen 
readers are trying to give you choices so your not stuck with one browser. Now 
apple only having to work with one browser still has problems. now try to 
support two browsers and try to add more on the list. we should be glad that GW 
and other screen readers have given us choices. GW is working hard to gives 
something that will work instead of putting something that can support it and 
not work correctly. do you want to use up all your free upgrades and then have 
them charge for the real fix? I rather them come out with fixes and be free 
upgrades but that is a different story. Just give them time and let them do it 
right. 

  Juan Gonzalez
  Need training at an affordable price? 
  Visit www.BlindAccessTraining.com to learn how to use Window-eyes, JAWS, and 
NVDA. 
  You can also learn how to make your own web site when you click on the web 
design link. 


  From: Jacob Schmude 
  Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 6:35 PM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Re: A bit of a rant (was Re: Observations with Window Eyes and Web 
Browsing)


  And why bother with that when other products just work? Again, what about 
pages where no alternative exists? I'm not necessarily intending to raise 
problems with specific web sites, but merely to provide examples. A lot of 
pages that have no alternative are internal or else private (bank web pages for 
example) so I can't exactly give them as examples. You can suggest all the 
alternatives you'd like, but when I hit a page that doesn't have one, I'm still 
left with the bug and no workaround where window-eyes is concerned.
  Still, I'm glad one of my objectives has been achieved: to spark a large 
discussion out in the open where it is much harder to ignore. Support requests 
and bug reports can be filed away, but it's more difficult to do that with list 
discussions as, even if the discussion is removed from the archives, those who 
participate will remember and know that it was deleted. I have a certain amount 
of loyalty to GW Micro, if I didn't I'd just ignore Window-Eyes' deficiencies 
and leave it at that. Sometimes, things must be dragged out no matter how 
unpleasant, and I think this is long past due. The web is important, more so 
today than ever before, and if we as blind people expect to keep up then we 
need to make sure the products on which we rely are able to do so with us. I am 
not willing to be relegated to the 90's where we needed text-only web pages 
because our screen readers couldn't keep up. I've been there before, and I'm 
not going back.

  On 6/12/2011 20:25, Juan Gonzalez wrote: 
    as far as youtube is concerned there is an accessible version and you can 
find the link at blindaccesstraining.com under the helpful resources 

    Juan Gonzalez
    Need training at an affordable price? 
    Visit www.BlindAccessTraining.com to learn how to use Window-eyes, JAWS, 
and NVDA. 
    You can also learn how to make your own web site when you click on the web 
design link. 


    From: Jacob Schmude 
    Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 6:21 PM
    To: [email protected] 
    Subject: Re: A bit of a rant (was Re: Observations with Window Eyes and Web 
Browsing)


    Doublas,
    Do you really think I haven't tried all of that? The mouse keys don't work 
for those links, not in Firefox. They do in IE, but that particular problem has 
only ever appeared in Firefox. Google was an *example*. Yes, you can use 
labs.google.com, but what am I supposed to do on Youtube? On Paypal? Wikipedia 
or other Wikis? How about specialized pages that I have to work with that have 
no alternative? I don't have the time to go looking for workarounds anymore. It 
would be one thing if these were general workarounds that all screen reader 
users needed to do, but they're not, and when the choice is find a workaround 
for almost everything I need to do or switch screen readers, it's not much of a 
choice. I have used window-eyes for nearly 10 years, so please give me credit 
that I've tried the obvious... over and over again. I like a lot about 
Window-Eyes, but in the past few versions, the bugs have just become more of a 
problem than the features can offset. I'll take a few less bling and a bit more 
work, thanks.



    On 6/12/2011 18:12, douglas rudolph wrote: 
      hey man, uhhh, i really don't know where to start. you don't know how to 
work around these issues obviously, very simple fixes i might add.. your google 
problem use
      labs.google.com/accible, or google.com/custom, and your links that dont' 
show as links such as on facebook with the status, link, photo, video, etc, use 
your mouse simulation keys... easy fix
      .This email may contain personal identifyable information. Copy, relay, 
redistributions, and or reading of these emails is strictly prohibited, unless 
you are the intended recipiant of this email, and this intended recipiant only. 
If this is not the intended recipiant, then you are requested to delete this 
message immediately and notify sender.
      Douglas Rudolph
      Tel: 1306-565-2056
      Cell: 1306-209-2823
      Email: [email protected]
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Jacob Schmude 
        To: [email protected] 
        Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 7:03 PM
        Subject: A bit of a rant (was Re: Observations with Window Eyes and Web 
Browsing)


        Hi
        ** Warning: Begin a sort of rant **
        Unfortunately, the Firefox issues have been in Window-Eyes for years. 
Essentially, dynamic content causes the entire page to be refreshed. Google's 
edit field causes the page to change as you type in order for it to suggest 
search results, and this triggers window-eyes' page reload behavior. We have 
been promised a fix for this for years and have never gotten it and, while I 
don't know about anyone else, I'm losing my patience with window-eyes on the 
web with Firefox in particular, but with IE as well. Window-Eyes' support for 
Firefox is a joke. Standard elements such as onclicks are not identified (most 
other screen readers call these clickables), image links are not identified as 
links, reviewing edited text doesn't work, the auto completion and history list 
in the address bar do not work properly (they briefly flash in Braille but 
never speak), flash within Firefox is not accessible, mouseOvers and other 
dynamic content do not update the buffer or when they do you are thrown to the 
top, and I could go on. These are things we've been promised fixes for, and 
what do we get? New whiz-bang features with old bugs. Internet Explorer 9 is 
not much better (GW, did you even test IE9 at all?). Dynamic pages with hidden 
elements are not properly rendered (the hidden elements are shown when they 
should not be, have a look at Gmail or Google Voice's pages for that one), 
There are random headings and lists with 0 items inserted everywhere while real 
headings are not identified (blindbargains.com for that last), entering text in 
forms somehow fails to allow all typed characters through (I'm a fast typist). 
Each and every one of these problems I've listed, the free screen reader NVDA 
has overcome (most of these it never exhibited at all). Jaws, that other screen 
reader, isn't far behind and Baum's Cobra doesn't have these troubles either. 
Quite frankly, given the importance of the internet, this is unacceptable and, 
as a Window-Eyes customer for years, I feel more than a little cheated. To GW: 
Don't follow FS down the path of release release release but don't fix. I don't 
care if it takes two years for a new version, as long as that new version of 
Window-Eyes works to the best of your abilities. This is not the best and, if 
you're going to brag about your IE9 support, you'd better make blasted sure it 
works as advertised. The 7.5 release only had one beta cycle. One. Let's look 
at this honestly for a second, no marketing, no pr. What does 7.5 offer over 
7.2 that is worth paying $175 for? A new set file format? Not worth that much. 
A few new scripting functions? Again, not worth that. Cascading settings (a 
nice feature and long overdue, but worth $175?). A rename of scripts to app 
(boy, that must've taken a lot of effort there). Meanwhile, long standing bugs 
go unfixed, and the web is just one area. I could go on but, these days, I'm 
not sure that GW Micro really care. I can't tell off the top of my head exactly 
how much I've put into window-eyes over the years since I've owned it, and I'm 
now using NVDA instead because it's less buggy and actually allows me to get 
real work done. That's just not acceptable QA in my book, and I can't in good 
conscience put my hard-earned cash behind a product with this many problems. I 
apologize for the harshness, but I've reported many of these within the past 
several years and have never seen one fix. Perhaps a little harshness will get 
my point across a bit better. I leave that up to you, GW Micro.

        ** end rant **
        I've never seen the IE8 hanging issue but I'm well familiar with the 
rest of the problems you're having. You're not alone.

        On 6/12/2011 14:58, Cory Martin wrote: 
              Hello, 
              Just wanted to report a couple of issues that I've noticed with 
Window Eyes with web browsing: 

              With Internet Explorer version 8: 
              Firstly there seem to be issues with Google, specifically after 
doing a search, for some reason browse mode doesn't come back on.  It can be 
enabled with the usual command, however it's the only site which doesn't seem 
to bring browse mode back on after entering a search string. 
              More difficult to identify however is a strange issue which seems 
to affect Internet Explorer where when the browser is first opened it just 
hangs, yet opening a second instance of it may work just fine.  I've tried 
resetting it in the advanced tab under internet options, as well as using 
C-Cleaner to remove extra files, as well as clearing personal data.  The issue 
persists, yet with other screen readers it doesn't seem to happen.  This does 
not seem to be a problem with Firefox. 

              With Mozilla Firefox latest version: 
              I switched to Firefox full time after having the unsolvable 
hanging problem with Internet Explorer.  However with Firefox, there seems to 
be issues with staying in forms for entering text.  For example if I'm trying 
to enter a word in to Google it keeps dropping me back in to browse mode every 
time I press the space bar.  I've had to use notepad to type out my search 
string and then paste it in to the browser.  I'm not sure which is more 
annoying. 

              With either browser: 
              When trying to arrow arrow around in edit boxes on web pages in 
both Internet Explorer or Firefox, Window Eyes just makes a ding sound when 
trying to review text entered.  It is necessary to drop back in to browse mode 
to review what's been entered and then re-enter the edit box and re-position 
the cursor to where one wants to correct something based on best guess, or by 
cutting the text to notepad and editing it there. 

              Does anyone have any experience with these problems to either 
confirm or deny them?  Also and more importantly, does anyone know of 
work-arounds to these issues? 

              Thanks, 
              Cory 
          If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original 
sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is 
related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to 
[email protected] so the entire list will receive it. 

          GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You 
can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv. 




  __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 6201 (20110612) __________

  The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

  http://www.eset.com

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

Reply via email to