No. Let me reiterate so Fletcher isn't repeating himself. If your players are having a good time, you won't be in trouble. The point is, it's mainly targeted towards gift drop exploiters and other bullshit admins do to advantage themselves against other players.
Kind regards, *Saul Rennison* On 28 October 2011 19:53, Jason <pctool...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, we have a set of rules and a lot of banned players who've tried > hacking us, trolling us, etc to get us back. What rules *WE* enforce should > be our business, shouldn't it? So we've got a large ban list of trolls, > dicks, hackers, etc. People often do not like us for actually enforcing our > rules....and want to "hate" on us. We have a decent player base who support > us and like that we take an active and often hardline approach toward the > "isms" (racism, sexism, ageism, etc.) as well as toward trolls/dicks in > general. > > Will valve "investigate" and actually consult with the server > owner/community? Do I need to start doing demos, screenshots and recordings > of folks spewing all of the hate speech and rule breaking just to cover my > back? I ask this because compared to some other servers, we *ARE* a little > more strict than other servers. So with this new subjective aspect, it has > me wondering what's to come. > > And why now? Free to play was implemented, which allows even more > anonymous trolls to make account after account (and even change their IP as > well), and now I gotta answer for banishing groups of them off my server? > This may just be the end of our servers, as I never thought, as a server > owner, I'd have to "answer" to Valve for the server I ran when I am not > violating any terms of service in doing so. > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:33 PM, E. Olsen <ceo.eol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That's a valid question - an abuse reporting system has been put in place, >> without telling the users what consittutes abuse (which I think would lead >> to many more false reports than not). Some guidelines (both for users and >> server operators) might be beneficial, both to keep down the number of >> nuisance reports, AND help the server operators to stay in compliance. It's >> all well and good to say that Valve reserves the right to ban servers/IP's >> for abuse, but without knowing what the rules/guidelines are, it's giving >> operators an invisible line and telling us "don't cross this". >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:18 PM, <doctor...@web.de> wrote: >> >>> What is considered as abusive behaviour? >>> ___________________________________________________________ >>> SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und >>> kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=021192 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>> please visit: >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > >
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
