I think so yes.
So based on that it makes sense to focus on interfaces and channels that allow management and efficiency.

-The token change to ban servers
-The group
-More transparency for the player

On 19.12.2015 01:48, Rowedahelicon wrote:
I'm open to either idea, but I think the bottom line should that we strive for an outcome both preferable to us and the TF2 player base as well, so as long as we're doing that then we're doing good?

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Matthias "InstantMuffin" Kollek <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I don't see any reason why someone needs to be a non-server op to
    represent the interests of server ops. The idea is to pick decent
    representatives that are server ops, and are willing to represent
    a consensus, with the added experience and expertise they have to
    properly recognize and understand point of views. The politics
    analogy isn't misplaced. You don't have a member of another party
    representing the other. Why? Conflict of interest. (How absurd I know)
    Maybe pick one non op and 5 server ops. It's still ridiculous.


    On 19.12.2015 01:34, Rowedahelicon wrote:
    Not necessarily, I've had people from my group tell me about how
    great it is and how annoying it's been what Valve has done.
    Though I feel maybe that would be more of someone wanting to see
    *my* community do good and less interested in the how / why. But
    I dunno, it's hard to say.

    And hey no need for "come on guys" , any idea is worth while and
    there is no need to bash anything

    On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Matthias "InstantMuffin" Kollek
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        A non server op also wouldn't care about servers. Simple as
        that. Yes, you should pick multiple people, and the right
        ones. But yes, you should at least pick someone who
        represents your party. Not only in terms of having an actual
        representative, but someone who shares the expertise and
        point of view. Come on guys.

        On 19.12.2015 01:17, Rowedahelicon wrote:
        I think a non serverop would be great.

        The personal investments are what drives everyone the way it
        does I imagine, but a non server op wouldn't need to care
        about a particular server, just the game itself. I think
        finding a candidate though would be difficult, unless we put
        together some input polls and gave it to our respective
        communities?

-- *Matthew (Rowedahelicon) Robinson*
        Web Designer / Artist / Writer
        Website - http://www.rowedahelicon.com/


        _______________________________________________
        To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
please visit:
        https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds


        _______________________________________________
        To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
        archives, please visit:
        https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds




-- *Matthew (Rowedahelicon) Robinson*
    Web Designer / Artist / Writer
    Website - http://www.rowedahelicon.com/


    _______________________________________________
    To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
please visit:
    https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds


    _______________________________________________
    To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
    archives, please visit:
    https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds




--
*Matthew (Rowedahelicon) Robinson*
Web Designer / Artist / Writer
Website - http://www.rowedahelicon.com/


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to