--- In [email protected], "kandoro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "toasterboy66" 
> <toaster@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], 
> > "dr_defecto" <mr_ieus@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone - new member to the forum!
> > > 
> > >
> > 
> > Hi There, I'm new too, I deal with and support Designjets 
> > professionally in central Europe.
> > 
> > 
> > I'd stay away from 130 for this kind of application, the Z2100 is 
> the 
> > way to go, if you add up all the accessoires to bring the 130 up 
to 
> > spec, you'll be rather close to the 24' Z2100 anyway, if you plan 
> on 
> > using HP consumables the larger cartridges of the Z might even 
save 
> > you some money in the long run.
> > I'd stay away from CISS, not worth it unless you are running a 
> > serious production, and when printing on such expensive media, 
ink 
> > costs are less of a factor anyway, esp. if you have to repeat 
> > printouts because of colour issues, which is almost always a 
> concern 
> > with 3rd party inks.
> > 
> > The 130 chassis was never really build for handling canvas, yes 
it 
> > can take rather thick paper from the rear paper paths, but after 
> all, 
> > it's a jumped up buiseness Inkjet, so fine art printing was never 
> > really the focus when designing it.
> > The Z-series chassis on the other hand was designed exactly for 
> this 
> > kind of thing, much more reliable.
> > Also, the pigmented inks of the Z are a huge plus, esp. on 
canvas, 
> > laminating goes against the idea of using canvas in the first 
place 
> > and spray on solutions are rather ineffective on this kind of 
> porous 
> > media.
> > And if you are using a rip, support for Media (ICC profiles) is 
> much 
> > better on the Z, both, from HP and 3rd parties, as are the 
> profiling 
> > options, another important consideration.
> > 
> > The only thing the 130 has really going for it is the Paper tray 
> (not 
> > suited for fine art papers).
> > If you can do without it, i'd try to bite the bullet and go for 
the 
> > small Z. 
> > Large format printing will never be cheap, however pinching 
pennies 
> > at the wrong end might make it really expensive.
> > 
> > As for the 5000, it's a great machine, unfortunately some spares 
> are 
> > hard to come by these days, but its a serious production printer 
> > anyway so it's probably 2 sizes too big for your needs.
> >
> 
> 
> You sound like a salesperson trying to sell more expensive OEM 
> equipment AND who hasn't used the HP 130 too much...AND doesn't 
know 
> much a canvas and protectant sprays...You sir are a perfect example 
> why one should find out for themselves rather than listen to the so 
> called experts...Sure the MUCH more expensive units have more 
> capabilites but you aren't giving the HP 130 nearly enough credit 
for 
> what it can do...I have printed over a thousand 24x36" canvas and 
> lustre prints using a HP 100 and now the HP 130 so I feel I have 
more 
> than enough experience to express my opinions...
> 
> It will easily handle 20 mil 100% cotton duck canvas FROM THE 
> FRONT...Forget about the back unless you use light paper and the 
roll 
> attachment...
> 
> Using QUALITY 3rd party inks with proper ICC profiling and you will 
> get equal or better results than the OEM Vivera inks...Use less 
> expensive proofing paper until the results are perfect for the 
final 
> canvas print...Start out with a resized 8x10 to see how close you 
are 
> and then work up from there... 
> Saying you will waste ink/canvas because of 3rd party inks is 
> ridiculous...Do you thinks HP actually makes their own 
inks?...NOT...
> 
> Krylon spray on UV protectant is PERFECT for canvas...Stating 
> spraying canvas is not effective is ignorant...Using Illuminata 
> canvas and the Krylon spray with archival, UV dye inks will produce 
a 
> surface that only lacquer thinner will penetrate...In fact the 
canvas 
> itself is so good that a very wet water rub will not smear at all...
> 
> There is no doubt that pigment inks offer some longevity 
values...But 
> along with that goes the extra cost and much more plugging which 
> equals down time AND lost media...
> 
> I've used a CIS for 4 years with my old HP 100 and newer HP 130 
with 
> not one problem...The entire unit with quality inks cost me the 
same 
> as one complete cartridge change...I've estimated at already saving 
> over a grand in ink costs...
> 
> Cheers...


I use both a DJ 130 and a Z2100. The previous post is absolutely 
correct about the Zs being better suited by design for canvas.  You 
can do it on a 130 but the Z series are certainly the way to go just 
for the profiling alone, not to mention the pigment inks and 
speed,etc,etc.



------------------------------------

Website: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPDesignJet_Printers
Post message: [email protected] 
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
List owner:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPDesignJet_Printers/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPDesignJet_Printers/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to