Am 10.07.2018 um 17:10 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
Personally I am interested in stitching 360 full, true HDR images. I am
hoping to stitch and get as much of original data as I can. With PtGui for
eg. I am able to throw my Canon RAWs directly and proper exposure merge is
being applied. With Hugin I am forced to use 3rd party apps for conversion
into TIFF or other format witch adds one more step of possible mistake.
raw data is by no means image data, it's the raw reading from the sensor
and it's awful. PTGui uses dcraw for conversion, which does a very basic
job. Using dcraw you loose almost all benefits of shooting raw including
correction of chromatic aberration, moiré, white balance, dead or hot
pixels, highlight restoration or noise reduction. You might well get
better images using jpeg straight from the camera. You don't get the
full dynamic range either, since dcraw clips all channels to the lowest
channel (thus avoiding a tint in clipped highlights). It is far better
to use a decent and dedicated raw converter.
--
Erik Krause
http://www.erik-krause.de
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/37e7e59e-0560-eca5-7bc0-1170e8022a33%40gmx.de.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
