Come on Dave! I trust the board members. If any of them were opposed I'm sure we would know about it by now. Let them do the job they were elected to do.
Caryl Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 30, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > >> On 30 June 2016 at 13:27, Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net> wrote: >>> On 27 June 2016 at 08:42, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: >>> Hi Tony >>> >>>> On 21 June 2016 at 23:00, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: >>>> Please provide me with 7 links to 7 emails on a public mailing list >>>> from 2016-05-05 to 2016-05-12 for each of the votes for this motion >>>> that you say you are aware of. >>> >>> Would you be willing to do this? > > Thanks for taking the time to do attempt this :) > > So, 4 of the votes were posted in private and you got them because you > are on the SLOB list; only 3 were public, and while you didn't provide > links that I can add to the Decisions page, I'll take your word for it > :) > > Previous on this thread you said: > > - "I believe the actions of the board have been clear and made in public." > > - "I don't remember anything private in those votes." > > - "I am certainly not aware of any motion made by a member of the > Board which has not been handled entirely in public." > > Given that 4 of the votes were posted in private, then I say those > statements are kindly mistaken. > > Rather, I would say: > > - the actions of the board have been clearly summarised (thank you > Walter) but not made in public > > - you have now reported the votes for one motion not made in public > > - that motion was therefore not handled entirely in public > > >> I think members should be able to keep their comments private. > > I agree - I said earlier, "As you know I have engaged the SLOBs list > privately over legally sensitive trademark matters, which I hope > demonstrates that I understand and agree with the need for a private > board discussion forum." > >> I'll try to look at the others, but I don't have more time at the moment. > > Please don't worry about it - it is clear that providing the > membership with 7 links to 7 emails on a public mailing list for each > motion is impossible, until the board passes a motion requiring votes > to be emailed to the IAEP and SLOB lists in order to be counted as > valid. > > As a SLOB member, would you be willing to post such a motion to > improve the operation of the project? > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep