>Why don't you call it an exercise instead of a test, then you can always say >that in an exercise you would expect something to fail and that's the reason for the exercise.
If I were the keeper of the corporate buzzwords, I would. I tried that route, at a major Canadian bank, and they told me it was confusing and stick to the script. Therefore, it's a test; politically, tests can't fail. Hence, careers ride the outcomes. Which is patently wrong. If you cover up the results of a 'test', you address those politics, and are less likely to address the uncovered 'issues'. - I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation! Kimota! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
