Regarding wrong IODF... DS QL,LIST and/or DS QL,LISTALL may be useful. Do you see 00001?
Regards, Kevin -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of O'Connor, Ruth Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2017 1:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OAM message CBR3006I with an MTL Mark and Kevin, The vendor also thinks I've got the wrong IODF somehow, but I'm sure the correct, newest, IODF has been activated. We do have Dell/EMC's Level 1 and 2 documents but they say we need our configuration working better before they can complete the Level 3 doc. I will ask them for a draft copy of Level 3 though when we meet on Friday morning. The SMS config certainly could have been incorrect because I have only recently been drafted as the mainframe storage administrator and am much more accustomed to using CA-Allocate than ISMF. We do have aging 3494 tape libraries but have always managed them with BTLS rather than dfsms so this is new territory for us. Thanks again. Ruth -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2017 12:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OAM message CBR3006I with an MTL On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 16:21:39 +0000, Neubert, Kevin <kevin.neub...@courts.wa.gov> wrote: >Seems like the desired IODF is not in effect. > >D SMS,LIB(DLMLIB),DETAIL should show the library ID in effect. > >D IOS,CONFIG will show the IODF in effect. If you are able, run this job >against your IODF. Output should confirm how your drives are currently >defined. > >// EXEC PROC=CBDJRPTS, >// RPARM='REPORT, M ,,,,,', >// IODF='YOUR.IODF.HERE' > >Regards, > >Kevin <snip> > 00000290 D SMS,LIB(DLMLIB),DETAIL > > 00000290 F OAM,D,LIB,DLMLIB,L=DSPROC-Z > >427 00000090 CBR1110I OAM library status: 532 > >532 00000090 TAPE LIB DEVICE TOT ONL AVL TOTAL EMPTY SCRTCH >ON OP >532 00000090 LIBRARY TYP TYPE DRV DRV DRV SLOTS SLOTS VOLS > >532 00000090 DLMLIB UNK 0 0 0 0 0 0 >Y N >532 00000090 >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >532 00000090 LIBRARY ID: 00001 > > It does show it as 00001 - the same as the gen. > >Mark Zelden asked " Are you sure the library id and libport match what >Dell/EMC set up?" >I can't verify that myself but will ask them to double check. Library id >"00001" is specified in both the I/O gen and SMS. Thanks to Lizette for pointing out that the SMS config could have been wrong also. I guess I just assume "hardware issue" first since us sysprogs always know what we are doing and never make mistakes. :-) Check with Dell/EMC. Also, for all the implementations I have been involved with, Dell/EMC typically provides an "Architecture level 2" and "Architecture level 3" document and they have had the library ids and port IDs identified for all the libraries being implemented within the DLm(s). If you have a document like that check it and see if they documented something else. Regards, Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS ITIL v3 Foundation Certified mailto:m...@mzelden.com Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://search390.techtarget.com/ateExperts/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
