On May 8, 2018, at 8:45 AM, John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Personally, if I wanted to be "pushy", I'd be all over the access method > people to make a native AMODE(64) interface to all datasets (i.e. update > BSAM, QSAM, and BPAM), say be extending the ACB somehow.
+1. This would be much more productive. -- Pew, Curtis G curtis....@austin.utexas.edu ITS Systems/Core/Administrative Services ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
