Are you suggesting setting changes to IMail? if so what changes do you suggest? --John "R. Scott Perry" wrote: > >And if sending a bounce message without the sender field is compliant > >to RFC, then the RFC needs to be changed. > > The RFCs are often very well thought out. The purposes of the <> in bounce > messages is to make sure that the bounce messages don't get automatically > responded to (which would produce a nice infinite loop). > > > Why would I want to accept any message without the sender field? > > [1] Don't you want to know if your E-mail couldn't be delivered to someone? > > [2] If you have any users who use those nasty return receipts, they won't > be able to get them. > > [3] If you don't accept the bounce messages, they will go back to the > postmaster at the remote domain, who will get upset with you (you're making > THEM do extra work for no good reason). > > [4] If you don't accept messages from <>, there are a number of mail > servers that will automatically refuse your mail. > -Scott > > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > to be removed from this list. > > An Archive of this list is available at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
begin:vcard n:Miller;John tel;fax:203-618-3399 tel;work:203-618-3336 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.800mcmahan.com org:McMahan Securities Co., L.P.;Information Systems version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Chief Information Officer adr;quoted-printable:;;500 West Putnam Avenue=0D=0A3rd Floor;Greenwich;CT;06830;USA fn:John M. Miller end:vcard
