Thanks, Taffazul ji
--
With regards,
J. M. Garg

On Fri, 27 Jan, 2023, 10:46 pm [email protected], <[email protected]>
wrote:

> For the information of any members who happen to visit this page I would
> like to mention that I have named this plant as *Apononea bagathii  *Syed
> and have reposted it as the the thread "A Novel Member Of The Boraginaceae
> Family From The Kashmir Valley". The link for this thread is given below:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/5fd92323-8706-4bf0-a564-b177bb1e9436n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
> With regards
> Taffazull
> On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 6:11:35 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Taffazull ji.
>>
>> --
>> With regards,
>> J. M. Garg
>> On Thu, 12 Jan, 2023, 5:28 pm [email protected], <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry it should be nutlet morphology not seed morphology.
>>> I think I myself get confused by the term stone seed .
>>> Regards
>>> Taffazull
>>>
>>> On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:14:59 PM UTC+5:30 [email protected]
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am posting a sketch of a typical seed of the plant. The tubercles
>>>> present on and between the ridges  are I think gland like structures that
>>>> contain secretions. In  seed morphology it greatly resembles the genus*
>>>> Nonea  *although its calyx is polysepalous  while calyx of the members
>>>> of the genus *Nonea  *is invariably gamosepalous . It would be fitting
>>>> to call it *Apononea * (apo=other ). As posting these details under
>>>> Stone flower is misleading I would be reposting all details in another
>>>> thread to avoid confusion.
>>>> Regards
>>>> Taffazull
>>>> On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 9:22:17 PM UTC+5:30 [email protected]
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry it should be GBIF.
>>>>> Sorry for the typo
>>>>> Hurry makes bad curry!
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Taffazull
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 9:01:43 PM UTC+5:30 [email protected]
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Garg Ji
>>>>>> The fruits are cut out from the same GBIF specimen to which  you are
>>>>>> referring !. This is the only online image available to my knowledge and
>>>>>> the collector is Kazimi. It is with the Smithsonian Institution and they
>>>>>> have very kindly put it with a no copyright licence which allows cutting
>>>>>> and pasting a particular part of the image.I cut out the branch on the
>>>>>> extreme right hand side and attached the photo to focus on the fruits 
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> are enclosed by the enlarged sepals that are gamosepalous with small 
>>>>>> lobes.
>>>>>> If you look at the GIBF specimen details you will find that it is  
>>>>>> written
>>>>>> "Publisher: National Museum Of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> "Record Licence..creativeco...cdomain/zero/1.0/ which if you follow the
>>>>>> link is No Copyright licence. I think this clarifies everything. My photo
>>>>>> is the extreme right side branch bearing fruits of the same GIBF specimen
>>>>>> to which you are referring.
>>>>>> With sincere regards and thanks for your incisive comments which have
>>>>>> helped to crystallize our problem
>>>>>> Taffazull
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 5:16:51 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Somehow, I am not convinced as per GBIF
>>>>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/species/4060686> specimen
>>>>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/tools/zoom/simple.html?src=//api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fn2t.net%2Fark%3A%2F65665%2Fm3b27b4d50-d6d1-4881-a253-bdc4ff155a55>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 12:13, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok, Taffazul ji
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>> J. M. Garg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 Jan, 2023, 1:20 pm [email protected], <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A photo of a herbarium specimen of *N.edgeworthii *A.DC. is
>>>>>>>>> available at gbif.org under creative commons (No Copyright)
>>>>>>>>> licence. This specimen has fruits a photo of which is attached
>>>>>>>>> below.(Attribution : "02910584.tif" - Nonea edgeworthii A.DC. 
>>>>>>>>> collected in
>>>>>>>>> Pakistan. (licensed under
>>>>>>>>> http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2235964880>  (see Photo2)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The fruits in which the calyx is enlarged clearly show a calyx in
>>>>>>>>> which the lobes are joined and individual lobes can only  be seen in 
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> upper part(See photo2).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is in accord with Kazmi's assertion for  Genus *Nonea "Calyx
>>>>>>>>> 5-fid , shortly or for ½ of its length, never divided to the base, 
>>>>>>>>> enlarged
>>>>>>>>> in fruit.."*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is as different from the calyx in the fruits of my herb as
>>>>>>>>> chalk from cheese. In the calyx of my herb the lobes are divided to 
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> base.(See photo 1).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Comparision with the herbarium specimen of *N.edgeworthii * A.DC.
>>>>>>>>> puts all doubts to rest and conclusively establishes that my herb:
>>>>>>>>> 1. Is not *N.edgeworthii * A.DC.
>>>>>>>>> 2'. It does not belong to genus  *Nonea* as the calyx lobes are
>>>>>>>>> divided to the base. However based on morphology of seeds and flowers 
>>>>>>>>>  it
>>>>>>>>> is closely related to *Nonea Medicus .*
>>>>>>>>> It can be confidently asserted that it is a novel member of the
>>>>>>>>> Boraginaceae family of which this is the first report from the Kashmir
>>>>>>>>> Valley.
>>>>>>>>> With regards
>>>>>>>>> Taffazull
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 6, 2023 at 4:00:54 PM UTC+5:30
>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear Mahadeswara ji ,
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for appreciation
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> Taffazull
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 6, 2023 at 9:30:17 AM UTC+5:30 Mahadeswara
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Great   Garg ji !
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 3:42:47 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Taffazull ji, for great details and analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> J. M. Garg
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan, 2023, 3:19 pm [email protected], <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry clicked the post button inadvertently
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prolate pollen is rather unusual in Nonea sp for in a study of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 *Nonea *species only one had prolate pollen grains rest had
>>>>>>>>>>>>> subprolate (spherical with pointed ends)(See attached table). 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Though
>>>>>>>>>>>>> microscopic appearance of pollen grains is not diagnostic it can 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> certainly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rule out a candidate if the morphology is  different
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 3:01:57 PM UTC+5:30
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *POLLEN*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am posting photos of pollen grains which I got by teasing the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anthers on a glass slide with a pin. I managed to take the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> photos with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheap "Students Microscope"  to which I have added an oil 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immersion lens
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and my entry level digital camera (Sony  DSC-W830). I think 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> photos of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pollen grains are a first for eflora
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as I have never seen them before. The pollen grains are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prolate(cigar shaped) with a single longitudinal furrow (sulcus) 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from pole to pole (monosulcate.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 2:46:33 PM UTC+5:30
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Photo of Anthers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 2:44:55 PM UTC+5:30
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Anthers*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5  stamens inserted  in the corolla tube just below the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> throat (Three are visible in the photo). The stalk by which 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they  are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attached(filament) is very short.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peering from above one can see the anthers only in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intact flower. In this feature it resembles *Nonea. *They
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are brownish yellow (see photo)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 2:30:27 PM UTC+5:30
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Garg ji,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the comment about FOP. Unfortunately their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sketch does not show calyx. In fact they must have followed 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kazimi the most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> towering authority there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Need expert opinion on this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here are more details about corolla
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Corolla:*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla is very delicately attached to the flower and in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two of them fell down as I was examining the calyx.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The corolla is approximately infundibuliform (like an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inverted bell).The lobes are very small about 1-1.5 mm as is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visible from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the photo'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The tube has a slight sinuous bend at the bottom (See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> photo). As I will show in a subsequent post the style is very 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> short and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must remain in the bend.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I speculate that this would be to avoid self pollination
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the anthers are just below the throat. Indulging in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> further speculation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one can surmise that the peculiar shape of the corolla 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggests that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pollinator might be a moth or butterfly with a long proboscis 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> descend to the bottom of the tube.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taffazull
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 11:58:53 AM UTC+5:30 JM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Garg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Taffazul ji.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But Flora of Pakistan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=250084488>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says about *Nonea edgeworthii* A. DC. in DC. as 'Calyx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6-7 mm long, up to 10 mm in fruit, dense hairy; lobes linear'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 17:43, [email protected] <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *A Surprising fact about the calyx*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the calyx Kazmi in his authoritative work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writes under the heading *Nonea  Medicus ,Philos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Bot.1:31.1789.:*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Calyx 5-fid , shortly or for ½ of its length, never
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> divided to the base, enlarged in fruit.."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (SMA Kazimi : A Revision Of The Boraginaceae of West
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pakistan And Kashmir(1971), Journal of Arnold 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arboretum,pp670-71.).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had fortunately two flowers left in the plant I had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transferred to the planter. I reexamined  the calyx and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found it is divided
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the base. This is also evident in the   fruit. (See 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> photos).It thus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to me that it is either a sub genus or something 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different. Would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request the opinion of experts. Many features resemble the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> genus *Nonea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *including position of anthers,  gynobasic very short
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> style morphology and attachment of nutlet which I will put 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in a subsequent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/68365947-d8b4-4d1b-a45a-166a263eb8ccn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/68365947-d8b4-4d1b-a45a-166a263eb8ccn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/ce955ce5-c503-42d2-ae6e-7344e51ab3ebn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/ce955ce5-c503-42d2-ae6e-7344e51ab3ebn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "eFloraofIndia" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/d7cf89f7-8733-4f84-9941-ecbcf505bef6n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/d7cf89f7-8733-4f84-9941-ecbcf505bef6n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "eFloraofIndia" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>
>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/a7ae5e21-7a19-423e-af9f-9f355f864e8bn%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/a7ae5e21-7a19-423e-af9f-9f355f864e8bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "eFloraofIndia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/8132c4da-81cb-4757-b121-66f1bef73f80n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/8132c4da-81cb-4757-b121-66f1bef73f80n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFCfg_vudUeqednHV_DfJXF4%2BFYZf-7q-f9YKU6PYDxFEA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to