Ok, Taffazul ji
--
With regards,
J. M. Garg

On Sun, 8 Jan, 2023, 1:20 pm [email protected], <[email protected]>
wrote:

> A photo of a herbarium specimen of *N.edgeworthii *A.DC. is available at
> gbif.org under creative commons (No Copyright) licence. This specimen has
> fruits a photo of which is attached below.(Attribution : "02910584.tif" -
> Nonea edgeworthii A.DC. collected in Pakistan. (licensed under
> http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
> <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2235964880>  (see Photo2)
>
> The fruits in which the calyx is enlarged clearly show a calyx in which
> the lobes are joined and individual lobes can only  be seen in the upper
> part(See photo2).
>
> This is in accord with Kazmi's assertion for  Genus *Nonea "Calyx 5-fid ,
> shortly or for ½ of its length, never divided to the base, enlarged in
> fruit.."*
>
> This is as different from the calyx in the fruits of my herb as chalk from
> cheese. In the calyx of my herb the lobes are divided to the base.(See
> photo 1).
>
> Comparision with the herbarium specimen of *N.edgeworthii * A.DC. puts
> all doubts to rest and conclusively establishes that my herb:
> 1. Is not *N.edgeworthii * A.DC.
> 2'. It does not belong to genus  *Nonea* as the calyx lobes are divided
> to the base. However based on morphology of seeds and flowers  it is
> closely related to *Nonea Medicus .*
> It can be confidently asserted that it is a novel member of the
> Boraginaceae family of which this is the first report from the Kashmir
> Valley.
> With regards
> Taffazull
>
> On Friday, January 6, 2023 at 4:00:54 PM UTC+5:30 [email protected]
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Mahadeswara ji ,
>> Thanks for appreciation
>> Regards
>> Taffazull
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 6, 2023 at 9:30:17 AM UTC+5:30 Mahadeswara wrote:
>>
>>> Great   Garg ji !
>>>
>>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 3:42:47 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks, Taffazull ji, for great details and analysis.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> With regards,
>>>> J. M. Garg
>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan, 2023, 3:19 pm [email protected], <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry clicked the post button inadvertently
>>>>> Prolate pollen is rather unusual in Nonea sp for in a study of 8 *Nonea
>>>>> *species only one had prolate pollen grains rest had subprolate
>>>>> (spherical with pointed ends)(See attached table). Though  microscopic
>>>>> appearance of pollen grains is not diagnostic it can certainly rule out a
>>>>> candidate if the morphology is  different
>>>>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 3:01:57 PM UTC+5:30 [email protected]
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> *POLLEN*
>>>>>> Am posting photos of pollen grains which I got by teasing the anthers
>>>>>> on a glass slide with a pin. I managed to take the photos with a cheap
>>>>>> "Students Microscope"  to which I have added an oil immersion lens and my
>>>>>> entry level digital camera (Sony  DSC-W830). I think photos of pollen
>>>>>> grains are a first for eflora
>>>>>> as I have never seen them before. The pollen grains are prolate(cigar
>>>>>> shaped) with a single longitudinal furrow (sulcus) running from pole to
>>>>>> pole (monosulcate.)
>>>>>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 2:46:33 PM UTC+5:30
>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Photo of Anthers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 2:44:55 PM UTC+5:30
>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Anthers*
>>>>>>>> 5  stamens inserted  in the corolla tube just below the throat
>>>>>>>> (Three are visible in the photo). The stalk by which they  are
>>>>>>>> attached(filament) is very short.
>>>>>>>> Peering from above one can see the anthers only in the intact
>>>>>>>> flower. In this feature it resembles *Nonea. *They are brownish
>>>>>>>> yellow (see photo)
>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 2:30:27 PM UTC+5:30
>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear Garg ji,
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the comment about FOP. Unfortunately their sketch does
>>>>>>>>> not show calyx. In fact they must have followed Kazimi the most 
>>>>>>>>> towering
>>>>>>>>> authority there.
>>>>>>>>> Need expert opinion on this
>>>>>>>>> Here are more details about corolla
>>>>>>>>> *Corolla:*
>>>>>>>>> Corolla is very delicately attached to the flower and in two of
>>>>>>>>> them fell down as I was examining the calyx.
>>>>>>>>> The corolla is approximately infundibuliform (like an inverted
>>>>>>>>> bell).The lobes are very small about 1-1.5 mm as is visible from the 
>>>>>>>>> photo'
>>>>>>>>> The tube has a slight sinuous bend at the bottom (See photo). As I
>>>>>>>>> will show in a subsequent post the style is very short and must 
>>>>>>>>> remain in
>>>>>>>>> the bend.
>>>>>>>>> I speculate that this would be to avoid self pollination as the
>>>>>>>>> anthers are just below the throat. Indulging in further speculation 
>>>>>>>>> one can
>>>>>>>>> surmise that the peculiar shape of the corolla suggests that the 
>>>>>>>>> pollinator
>>>>>>>>> might be a moth or butterfly with a long proboscis which can descend 
>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>> bottom of the tube.
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Taffazull
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 11:58:53 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Taffazul ji.
>>>>>>>>>> But Flora of Pakistan
>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=250084488>
>>>>>>>>>> says about *Nonea edgeworthii* A. DC. in DC. as 'Calyx 6-7 mm
>>>>>>>>>> long, up to 10 mm in fruit, dense hairy; lobes linear'
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 17:43, [email protected] <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *A Surprising fact about the calyx*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the calyx Kazmi in his authoritative work writes under
>>>>>>>>>>> the heading *Nonea  Medicus ,Philos .Bot.1:31.1789.:*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Calyx 5-fid , shortly or for ½ of its length, never divided to
>>>>>>>>>>> the base, enlarged in fruit.."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> (SMA Kazimi : A Revision Of The Boraginaceae of West Pakistan
>>>>>>>>>>> And Kashmir(1971), Journal of Arnold Arboretum,pp670-71.).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I had fortunately two flowers left in the plant I had
>>>>>>>>>>> transferred to the planter. I reexamined  the calyx and found it is 
>>>>>>>>>>> divided
>>>>>>>>>>> to the base. This is also evident in the   fruit. (See photos).It 
>>>>>>>>>>> thus
>>>>>>>>>>> seems to me that it is either a sub genus or something different. 
>>>>>>>>>>> Would
>>>>>>>>>>> request the opinion of experts. Many features resemble the genus 
>>>>>>>>>>> *Nonea
>>>>>>>>>>> *including position of anthers,  gynobasic very short style
>>>>>>>>>>> morphology and attachment of nutlet which I will put in a 
>>>>>>>>>>> subsequent post.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/68365947-d8b4-4d1b-a45a-166a263eb8ccn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/68365947-d8b4-4d1b-a45a-166a263eb8ccn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "eFloraofIndia" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>>
>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/ce955ce5-c503-42d2-ae6e-7344e51ab3ebn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/ce955ce5-c503-42d2-ae6e-7344e51ab3ebn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "eFloraofIndia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/d7cf89f7-8733-4f84-9941-ecbcf505bef6n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/d7cf89f7-8733-4f84-9941-ecbcf505bef6n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFBh0fJCTNDgV_0vvUrYNxn0R3Pz5%3DsME%2Br4mUi_%2Bk4OwQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to