Marcos Cruz scrit in 2021-09-27T19:29:58+0200: > RAMSTED HAVE RASON: li exception es li termination *adverbial* «-men», > ne qualcunc parol-fine «men»! > > In contrari, Janotta e Hass scrit erratori explicationes queles fa > creder que li regular accentuation de ti paroles es tAmen, fenOmen e > pergAmen, o mem, secun un subtil ma possibil interpretation del textu de > Haas (t.e. su expression *precedent parol-parte*): tA(men), fEno(men), > pErga(men).
Yo ha just leet li sam erratori explication in li prim capitul de «Interlingue for Beginners» (by Wilfrid E. Reeve, 1966), <https://occidental-lang.com/interlingue-for-beginners/1.html#8>: ____ The stress is on the vowel preceding the last consonant. The endings -bil, -ic, -im, -ul, -um, -men and the plural -es however do not take a stress. Unusual stresses are marked, e.g., "societé", "armé". ____ U on di «-men» on deve dir «the adverbial -men». Ínfelicimen yo ha presc obliviat li usation de Git por contribuer al corection. In omni casu, li edition web de ti textu es bonissim! -- Marcos Cruz http://alinome.net -- ne.alinome.net -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#510): https://groups.io/g/interlingue/message/510 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/79107414/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/interlingue/leave/5161842/21656/2010256328/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
