Hello, the point Stanislav is really not about whom; that's about thinking, work, effort, personal walk thru a problem; and I am sorry he is fully right; live example:
"I think that's been inconsistencies from the part of early contributors which is the same reason we are having "haystack and needle" problem and I'm not sure there's a problem fixing those old days mistake." is this embodiment of arrogance, vulgarity hence stupidity because to me they are synonyms helps anyone? Regards. On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:39 PM Mark Randall <marand...@php.net> wrote: > On 09/10/2019 00:26, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > That's part of the problem. RFC should be for something that is > > necessary and beneficial for the whole community, doubly and triply so > > when we're talking about BC breaks. It shouldn't be just "whatever I > > want, let me put it to a vote". RFCs are not a twitter poll where > > anybody can vote on anything and anything goes. It should be used > > responsibly, and if people don't understand this responsibility maybe > > it's too early for them to propose any RFCs. > > Might I request that you please stick to discussing the actual topic of > the RFC, rather than trying to shift the conversation towards who can > and cannot propose RFCs :-) > > If you want to discuss changing the RFC mechanics and who is entitled to > make them, please make your own RFC. > > Thank you. > > Mark Randall > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
