On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, 12:59 AM M. W. Moe <mo.mu....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > the point Stanislav is really not about whom; that's about thinking, work, > effort, personal walk thru a problem; > and I am sorry he is fully right; live example: > > "I think that's been inconsistencies from the part of early contributors > which is the same reason we are having "haystack and needle" problem and > I'm not sure there's a problem fixing those old days mistake." > > is this embodiment of arrogance, vulgarity hence stupidity because to me > they are synonyms helps anyone? > > Regards. > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:39 PM Mark Randall <marand...@php.net> wrote: > > > On 09/10/2019 00:26, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > > That's part of the problem. RFC should be for something that is > > > necessary and beneficial for the whole community, doubly and triply so > > > when we're talking about BC breaks. It shouldn't be just "whatever I > > > want, let me put it to a vote". RFCs are not a twitter poll where > > > anybody can vote on anything and anything goes. It should be used > > > responsibly, and if people don't understand this responsibility maybe > > > it's too early for them to propose any RFCs. > > > > Might I request that you please stick to discussing the actual topic of > > the RFC, rather than trying to shift the conversation towards who can > > and cannot propose RFCs :-) > > > > If you want to discuss changing the RFC mechanics and who is entitled to > > make them, please make your own RFC. > > > > Thank you. > > > > Mark Randall > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > I think you've been using too much of "vulg**, stup**, etc" that makes absolute nonsense since yesterday. Can you just tone down or watch what you write if you're vexing out about someone else's opinion?
Even I can do same back to you, but won't stoop so low to that level. I think this list should be for mature minds that can agree or disagree peacefully without stupidity in becoming. >