So is Flash. 

-G

On Feb 3, 2010, at 1:58 PM, Mr Junk wrote:

> html5 transitions are hardware accelerated.
> 
> That makes it much better.
> 
> -ml
> 
> On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:24 AM, QuickConnect wrote:
> 
>> You are right HTML 5 is not flash.  However much of what you can do
>> with Flash you can do with HTML 5.
>> 
>> For example it does the same kinds of animations and transitions that
>> you can do with Flash and it does them with fewer lines of code.  It
>> does local database access and storage.  When you need to contact a
>> server for more data or other communication you use the XMLHttpRequest
>> object to do AJAX just as you can do AJAX in flash.
>> 
>> For video streaming you use a video tag.
>> 
>> With these abilities it seems to me that most of what someone uses
>> Flash for can be done in HTML 5.  If not, what am I missing?
>> 
>> If this is so then it seems to me that this Flash vs. HTML 5 argument
>> comes down to nothing more than just a preference of the developer/
>> engineer for one or the other.  This, of course, is if we ignore that
>> IE will more than likely always be slow to adopt this new
>> functionality as it has with most others.
>> 
>> On Feb 2, 10:04 pm, Remi Grumeau <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> What i do know (or i'm pretty sure about) is that mobile handhelds are 
>>> going to be, in the next 5 years or a bit more, the way most of people are 
>>> going to get connected with (phone, iPad, whatever has a touchscreen, …).
>>> So if Flash Player is not compatible with those, everything is possible 
>>> (even the death of the format, to be replace by another - even by Adobe 
>>> itself !)… but i'm agree with the fact HTML5 is not Flash: different 
>>> formats, different goals for different needs !
>>> 
>>> Remi
>>> 
>>> Le 2 févr. 2010 à 22:39, David Orchard a écrit :
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> People write for some market share that they feel comfortable with,
>>>> that's all.  Whether it's IE, or Flash, or HTML5 (which is basically
>>>> being written by one person), it doesn't really matter that much.
>>>> What is at least decent about Apple is that Webkit and Safari are
>>>> leading the implementation of a variety of web specs, including HTML5
>>>> and CSS.  That is progressing our capabilities to deliver content,
>>>> unlike MSFT who pretty much stopped development on IE for a long time.
>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Dave
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Mr Junk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> People wrote specifically for IE, that broke the web for everyone else.
>>>>> People write specifically for Flash, that breaks the web for everyone 
>>>>> else.
>>>>> Standards are good.
>>>>> Companies who shun them should go away.
>>>>> MS = Adobe = Fail
>>>>> On Jan 29, 2010, at 9:49 AM, ade wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> here's the classic conversation we have with clients who want their 
>>>>> website
>>>>> to be linked on iphone friendly sites and from our app:
>>> 
>>>>> "sorry but your lovely looking website doesnt work on an iphone etc"
>>> 
>>>>> today some have said "this ipad looks great"
>>> 
>>>>> "your website wont work on that either"
>>> 
>>>>> however it does mean extra work(income) in making an iphone/ipad friendly
>>>>> website for them ;)
>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> ade
>>>>> ...........................................................................
>>>>>  ................
>>>>> www.ibizaA-Z.com
>>>>> www.iphoneibiza.com
>>>>> www.podcast-ibiza.com
>>>>> www.ishopibiza.com
>>>>> www.ibiza-blog.com
>>>>> www.ibizawinter.com
>>>>> www.ibizaa-z.com/webcam
>>>>> http://twitter.com/blogibiza
>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>>> "iPhoneWebDev" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/iphonewebdev?hl=en.
>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>>> "iPhoneWebDev" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/iphonewebdev?hl=en.
>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "iPhoneWebDev" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/iphonewebdev?hl=en.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "iPhoneWebDev" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/iphonewebdev?hl=en.
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "iPhoneWebDev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/iphonewebdev?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"iPhoneWebDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/iphonewebdev?hl=en.

Reply via email to