ipv6-ops  

Messages by Date

• 2013/06/29 Re: same link-local address on multiple interface and OSPFv3 Gert Doering
• 2013/06/29 Re: same link-local address on multiple interface and OSPFv3 Doug Barton
• 2013/06/29 Re: same link-local address on multiple interface and OSPFv3 Benedikt Stockebrand
• 2013/06/29 Re: same link-local address on multiple interface and OSPFv3 Phil Mayers
• 2013/06/28 Re: same link-local address on multiple interface and OSPFv3 Matjaž Straus Istenič
• 2013/06/28 Re: same link-local address on multiple interface and OSPFv3 Brian E Carpenter
• 2013/06/28 Re: same link-local address on multiple interface and OSPFv3 Benedikt Stockebrand
• 2013/06/28 Re: [c-nsp] RESOLVED: Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic John Neiberger
• 2013/06/28 Re: [c-nsp] Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic Blake Dunlap
• 2013/06/28 Re: [c-nsp] Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic John Neiberger
• 2013/06/28 Re: [c-nsp] Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic John Neiberger
• 2013/06/28 Re: RESOLVED: Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic Imtiaz sajid
• 2013/06/28 RESOLVED: Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic Matthew Huff
• 2013/06/28 Re: Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic Imtiaz sajid
• 2013/06/28 RE: [c-nsp] Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic Matthew Huff
• 2013/06/28 Re: Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic Phil Mayers
• 2013/06/28 Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic Matthew Huff
• 2013/06/28 Re: same link-local address on multiple interface and OSPFv3 Mikael Abrahamsson
• 2013/06/28 same link-local address on multiple interface and OSPFv3 Matjaž Straus Istenič
• 2013/06/28 Re: DAD - on or off Benedikt Stockebrand
• 2013/06/26 Re: measurement data of IPv6 flows and IPv6 download rate for Dual-Stack subscribers Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
• 2013/06/26 Re: [ipv6-ops] Re: DAD - on or off Aaron Hughes
• 2013/06/26 Re: measurement data of IPv6 flows and IPv6 download rate for Dual-Stack subscribers Matej Gregr
• 2013/06/26 Re: DAD - on or off Gert Doering
• 2013/06/26 measurement data of IPv6 flows and IPv6 download rate for Dual-Stack subscribers Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
• 2013/06/26 RE: DAD - on or off Koch, Andrew
• 2013/06/26 Re: DAD - on or off Phil Mayers
• 2013/06/25 Re: DAD - on or off Mikael Abrahamsson
• 2013/06/25 DAD - on or off Merike Kaeo
• 2013/06/25 RE: slaac/privacy extensions disable at boottime at linux Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• 2013/06/25 Re: slaac/privacy extensions disable at boottime at linux Thomas Schäfer
• 2013/06/25 Re: slaac/privacy extensions disable at boottime at linux Benedikt Stockebrand
• 2013/06/25 Re: slaac/privacy extensions disable at boottime at linux Phil Mayers
• 2013/06/25 slaac/privacy extensions disable at boottime at linux Thomas Schäfer
• 2013/06/19 Wiki for people doing IPv6-only testing Jason Fesler
• 2013/06/17 Re: IPv6 Multicast issue? jtrotz .
• 2013/06/17 Re: IPv6 Multicast issue? Henri Wahl
• 2013/06/17 IPv6 Multicast issue? jtrotz .
• 2013/06/14 RE: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Guillaume.Leclanche
• 2013/06/14 Re: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Gert Doering
• 2013/06/14 RE: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Guillaume.Leclanche
• 2013/06/14 Re: Windows 2008R2 MTU reverts to default Benedikt Stockebrand
• 2013/06/13 RE: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Mikael Abrahamsson
• 2013/06/13 Re: Windows 2008R2 MTU reverts to default Fernando Gont
• 2013/06/13 ipv6hackers meeting in Berlin (July 28th, 2013) Fernando Gont
• 2013/06/13 Re: godaddy ipv6 nameservers are not reachable Mohacsi Janos
• 2013/06/12 Re: godaddy ipv6 nameservers are not reachable Mikael Abrahamsson
• 2013/06/12 Re: godaddy ipv6 nameservers are not reachable Matjaž Straus Istenič
• 2013/06/12 godaddy ipv6 nameservers are not reachable Mohacsi Janos
• 2013/06/11 Re: Windows 2008R2 MTU reverts to default Mikael Abrahamsson
• 2013/06/11 Re: Windows 2008R2 MTU reverts to default Enno Rey
• 2013/06/11 Re: Windows 2008R2 MTU reverts to default Daniel Roesen
• 2013/06/10 Re: Windows 2008R2 MTU reverts to default Enno Rey
• 2013/06/10 Re: 6PE mapped addresses used for ICMPv6 responses - knob to fix that? Darrell Newcomb
• 2013/06/10 Re: 6PE mapped addresses used for ICMPv6 responses - knob to fix that? David Farmer
• 2013/06/10 RE: Windows 2008R2 MTU reverts to default Christopher Werny
• 2013/06/10 Re: Windows 2008R2 MTU reverts to default Dick Visser
• 2013/06/10 Re: Windows 2008R2 MTU reverts to default Phil Pennock
• 2013/06/10 Windows 2008R2 MTU reverts to default Dick Visser
• 2013/06/10 RE: Looking for support.netapp.com contact Mikael Abrahamsson
• 2013/06/10 Re: Facebook broken over v6? Doug Porter
• 2013/06/10 Re: Facebook broken over v6? Chad Greene
• 2013/06/08 Re: Facebook broken over v6? Bryan Fields
• 2013/06/08 Re: Dual stack statistics? Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
• 2013/06/07 Re: Facebook broken over v6? Marco d'Itri
• 2013/06/07 Re: Facebook broken over v6? Jeroen Massar
• 2013/06/07 Re: Facebook broken over v6? Max Tulyev
• 2013/06/07 Re: Facebook broken over v6? Jeroen Massar
• 2013/06/07 Facebook broken over v6? Aaron Hughes
• 2013/06/04 Re: Looking for support.netapp.com contact Doug Barton
• 2013/06/04 Re: Looking for support.netapp.com contact Eggert, Lars
• 2013/06/03 Re: Point-to-point /64 Matt Addison
• 2013/06/03 Re: Looking for support.netapp.com contact John Mann
• 2013/06/03 RE: Looking for support.netapp.com contact Frank Bulk (iname.com)
• 2013/06/03 Re: Point-to-point /64 Phil Mayers
• 2013/06/03 Re: Point-to-point /64 Havard Eidnes
• 2013/06/03 MS HyperV virtual switch blocking IPv6 RAs? Antonio Querubin
• 2013/06/02 RE: Point-to-point /64 Ivan Pepelnjak
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 sthaug
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Darren Pilgrim
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Sander Steffann
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Brian E Carpenter
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Brian E Carpenter
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Darren Pilgrim
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Darren Pilgrim
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Benedikt Stockebrand
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Gert Doering
• 2013/06/02 RE: Point-to-point /64 Ivan Pepelnjak
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Ole Troan
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 cb.list6
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 sthaug
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Jared Mauch
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Daniel Roesen
• 2013/06/02 RE: Point-to-point /64 Ivan Pepelnjak
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Gert Doering
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Gert Doering
• 2013/06/02 Re: Point-to-point /64 Wade Roberts
• 2013/06/01 RE: Point-to-point /64 Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Jeroen Massar
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Sander Steffann
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Ole Troan
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Jeroen Massar
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Sander Steffann
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Arie Vayner
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 sthaug
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Ole Troan
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Jeroen Massar
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Tore Anderson
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 cb.list6
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Arturo Servin
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Ole Troan
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Arturo Servin
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Jeroen Massar
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Arturo Servin
• 2013/06/01 Re: Point-to-point /64 Jeroen Massar
• 2013/06/01 Point-to-point /64 Arturo Servin
• 2013/05/31 Re: 6PE mapped addresses used for ICMPv6 responses - knob to fix that? Tore Anderson
• 2013/05/31 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Dan Wing
• 2013/05/31 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Marco d'Itri
• 2013/05/31 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Emile Aben
• 2013/05/30 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Marco d'Itri
• 2013/05/30 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Jared Mauch
• 2013/05/30 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Gert Doering
• 2013/05/30 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Brian E Carpenter
• 2013/05/30 6PE mapped addresses used for ICMPv6 responses - knob to fix that? Jeroen Massar
• 2013/05/30 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Pim van Pelt
• 2013/05/30 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Patrick Tudor
• 2013/05/30 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Jeroen Massar
• 2013/05/30 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Jared Mauch
• 2013/05/30 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Marco d'Itri
• 2013/05/30 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
• 2013/05/30 RE: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Matthew Huff
• 2013/05/30 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? staticsafe
• 2013/05/30 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Jared Mauch
• 2013/05/30 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Jared Mauch
• 2013/05/30 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? staticsafe
• 2013/05/30 Re: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Jeroen Massar
• 2013/05/30 is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders? Marco d'Itri
• 2013/05/30 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Jeroen Massar
• 2013/05/30 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Jeroen Massar
• 2013/05/30 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF aservin
• 2013/05/30 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Gert Doering
• 2013/05/30 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF sthaug
• 2013/05/29 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Jan Boogman
• 2013/05/29 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Tore Anderson
• 2013/05/29 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Tim Chown
• 2013/05/29 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Jan Boogman
• 2013/05/29 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Jeroen Massar
• 2013/05/29 RE: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• 2013/05/29 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Jeroen Massar
• 2013/05/29 Re: Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Brian E Carpenter
• 2013/05/29 Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF Jeroen Massar
• 2013/05/26 Another IPv6 forum Brian E Carpenter
• 2013/05/25 RE: Looking for support.netapp.com contact Frank Bulk (iname.com)
• 2013/05/24 Re: Too-frequent change of privacy address / ND monitoring Tim Chown
• 2013/05/24 Re: Too-frequent change of privacy address / ND monitoring Phil Mayers
• 2013/05/22 Re: DHCPv6 accounting Brian E Carpenter
• 2013/05/22 Fresh meat Mat Ford
• 2013/05/22 Avoiding autoconf on RHEL6 and related distros Phil Mayers
• 2013/05/22 Re: Avoiding EUI64 addresses on Ubuntu 12.04 Bernhard Schmidt
• 2013/05/22 Re: Avoiding EUI64 addresses on Ubuntu 12.04 Seth Mattinen
• 2013/05/22 Re: Avoiding EUI64 addresses on Ubuntu 12.04 Mark Elkins
• 2013/05/22 Re: Avoiding EUI64 addresses on Ubuntu 12.04 Nick Hilliard
• 2013/05/22 Re: Avoiding EUI64 addresses on Ubuntu 12.04 JP
• 2013/05/22 Re: Avoiding EUI64 addresses on Ubuntu 12.04 Mikael Abrahamsson
• 2013/05/22 Avoiding EUI64 addresses on Ubuntu 12.04 Dick Visser
• 2013/05/22 RE: DHCPv6 accounting Tjeldnes, Terje
• 2013/05/21 RE: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• 2013/05/21 RE: DHCPv6 accounting Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• 2013/05/21 Re: DHCPv6 accounting Erik Kline
• 2013/05/21 Re: DHCPv6 accounting Tim Chown
• 2013/05/21 Re: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Lorenzo Colitti
• 2013/05/21 Re: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Arturo Servin
• 2013/05/21 Re: DHCPv6 accounting Brian E Carpenter
• 2013/05/21 Re: DHCPv6 accounting Phil Mayers
• 2013/05/21 RE: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• 2013/05/21 Re: DHCPv6 accounting Tim Chown
• 2013/05/21 Re: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Jan Schaumann
• 2013/05/21 Re: DHCPv6 accounting MarcoH - Lists
• 2013/05/21 Re: DHCPv6 accounting Phil Mayers
• 2013/05/21 RE: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• 2013/05/21 Re: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
• 2013/05/21 RE: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Guillaume.Leclanche
• 2013/05/21 Re: DHCPv6 accounting Shumon Huque
• 2013/05/21 Re: DHCPv6 accounting Marco Sommani
• 2013/05/21 Re: DHCPv6 accounting Tim Chown
• 2013/05/21 Re: New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Tore Anderson
• 2013/05/21 New IPv6 king of the hill: Switzerland? Tore Anderson
• 2013/05/21 Re: DHCPv6 accounting Nick Hilliard
• 2013/05/21 DHCPv6 accounting Liviu Pislaru
• 2013/05/14 Re: Looking for support.netapp.com contact Bernhard Schmidt
• 2013/05/13 Re: http://www.6assistnet/ - call for test Templin, Fred L
• 2013/05/13 Lebanon & IPv6 Jeroen Massar
• 2013/05/13 RE: http://www.6assist.net/ - call for test ISOC Lebanon
• 2013/05/12 Re: http://www.6assist.net/ - call for test Max Tulyev
• 2013/05/12 Re: http://www.6assist.net/ - call for test Tayeb Meftah
• 2013/05/12 Re: http://www.6assist.net/ - call for test Jeroen Massar
• 2013/05/12 RE: http://www.6assist.net/ - call for test Ivan Pepelnjak
• 2013/05/11 Re: http://www.6assist.net/ - call for test Max Tulyev
• 2013/05/11 Re: http://www.6assist.net/ - call for test Pim van Pelt

• Earlier messages
• Later messages