Hi Matt, 2010/2/9 mattschinkel <[email protected]>
> What about making this new editor look and feel like jaledit, but > named jaledit 2.0? Would Sunish be ok with this? > Why not ? But how different it is from what I'm doing, except the name ? (and you were not in favor ?) > > You mentioned Scintilla, I use this editor for another language and it > is quite nice. Scintilla has been customized for this other open > source language "Autoit". You may be able get this custom version and > edit it for jal. It already has things like compile button and compile > output. > >From what I understand, Scintilla provides framework to deal with code, syntax hightlight, etc... It's not an editor on its own. Do you mean "Scite" ? > > I'm not sure how far along you are with this new IDE. > Not very far ! Syntax highlight, compile/upload with custom commands, logs, clickable error points to corresponding lines, maybe few other things I can't remember. What is interesting is how many LOC are required and how it can be done. For now, it's a prototype, though I'm working on easy install/deployment (usually not the thing to care about in prototyping stage...), and a way to learn how to deal with Editra (IDE on which it's based). > > Others here have not said "let's put an editor in the jallib pack". I > am wondering if they will allow this new editor to be placed into the > pack when it is finnished. Maybe this is a question to ask before > writing a new IDE. > I never said that I would put this editor in jallib-pack... This is primarily for jaluino, and it's way too far from jaledit's cool stuffs to be included in a jallib pack. To be honest, I'm not a big fan of IDE myself. I'm too stuck to "vim" shortcut. Luckily Editra has "vim" emulation commands, and could be a reason for me to use it :) That said, I understand how important it is to provide an integrated tool in order for users to easily getting started. That's why I'm doing this, or at least try to. Cheers, Seb > > On Feb 9, 2:09 am, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > > > 2010/2/9 mattschinkel <[email protected]> > > > > > > But it's windows only... I'm currently working on an IDE for Jaluino, > > > > cross-platform. Can't be compared to jaledit, but may be an > alternative. > > > > > Why another IDE? Why don't you either help Sunish re-write Jaledit to > > > cross-platform (maybe jaledit 2.0) with the same look and feel, or use > > > PICshell? > > > > What I'm looking for is an IDE I could write specific plugins for, > dedicated > > to Jaluino. I want it to be cross-platform too. > > > > About PICShell: as you know, I really like the unittest feature and the > > possibility to follow jal code and asm code side by side. But these are > > features I don't want to expose to users, too much advanced. There's no > > plugin architecture. > > > > About Jaledit: I wish I could use it, really, but it's not > cross-plaftform, > > and wine isn't a solution IMO. It's not integrated to original desktop > > (filesystem, drag'n drop interaction, etc...). I don't know if it also > work > > under wine with OSX. There's no plugin architecture too, so I can't > > customize it. Already discussed this with Sunish, making jaledit > > cross-plaftform would require to wait synedit to be cross-platform, and > move > > to another underlying editor, like Scintilla (and rewrite it). (Sunish, > > correct me if I'm wrong...) > > > > So that's why I'm trying to build yet another IDE, though I wish I > wouldn't > > have to. > > > > > > > > > As Sunish would say "Jaledit runs under wine". So is it possible to > > > have a Jaledit that already contains wine so people don't need to > > > install Wine? > > > > As I said, using wine won't fill the gap of being cross-platform. It's > > artificial, slow, rather ugly, and sometime crashes (depends on version). > > > > > > > > > I would much prefer a solution other then build a new IDE. > > > > I would too, but don't seem to have choice by now :) > > > > Cheers, > > Seb > > -- > > Sébastien Lelonghttp://www.sirloon.nethttp://sirbot.org > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jallib" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<jallib%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. > > -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
