Hi, On Jan 15, 8:45 am, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Vasi, > > 2011/1/14 funlw65(Vasi) <[email protected]>: > > > The delay from convert function... > > > Well, you can rework the function and, depending on the resolution > > (9,10,11,12), you can set the required delay(as in the table from the > > datasheet), saving the user in taking care about delay.... > > This is an option. Downside is the pic will be busy for up to 750ms, > while it could do other work since the sensor is doing the conversion > on its own.
If you just show the temperature, then you don't need delays. If you take actions regarding the temperature values, then you need the real temperature from the first cycles of your loop. > I'll probably supply two different procedures, one with and one > without the delay. I think it will be good to have both variants. > > Joep > > ps I am still curious what value worked for you in your test last > night though ;) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
