Sorry for the delay. I'm in the process of migrating to the concurrent backport. http://backport-jsr166.sourceforge.net/index.php
Aaron --- On Wed, 10/21/09, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for concurrent.jar > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 9:40 AM > Hi Aaron. > > Sorry to bother you again .. :) Is there any news on this > issue ? > > Kind regards, > Nuno > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 15:28, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi :) > > > > No worries.. take your time. > > > > Thanks > > Nuno > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 15:25, Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > >> Sorry for the delay. I'm working on it, but > lots of other things keep > >> coming up. It will take a couple more > weeks. > >> > >> Aaron > >> > >> --- On Thu, 10/1/09, Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > From: Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> > >> > Subject: Re: Remove dependency for > concurrent.jar > >> > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> > >> > Date: Thursday, October 1, 2009, 12:13 PM > >> > Hi Aaron, > >> > > >> > Sorry to bother you again with this issue.. > >> > > >> > Are there any news regarding this ? > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > Nuno > >> > > >> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 16:23, Nuno Sénica > <nsen...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi Aaron :) > >> > > > >> > > Here I am again querying you on the > status of this > >> > task. > >> > > > >> > > Did you have the chance the start it ? > :) How it is > >> > going. > >> > > > >> > > Best regards, > >> > > Nuno Sénica > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31, Nuno > Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Hi Aaron > >> > >> > >> > >> Once again thanks for your inputs.. > >> > >> > >> > >> Since it is not a matter of find and > replace, > >> > maybe I'll wait a couple of > >> > >> weeks so that you take on that task > :) > >> > >> > >> > >> I'll poke by then just to know how > the work is > >> > going. > >> > >> > >> > >> Regads and thanks a lot once again. > >> > >> > >> > >> Nuno > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:24, Aaron > Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> It's not a simple matter of find > and > >> > replace. If it was, I would have > >> > >>> done it some time back. . . . > >> > >>> > >> > >>> This is such an extensive > change, it's > >> > probably best that I do it. But > >> > >>> feel free to give it a try. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Thanks, > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Aaron > >> > >>> > >> > >>> --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Aaron Smuts > <asm...@yahoo.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > From: Aaron Smuts <asm...@yahoo.com> > >> > >>> > Subject: Re: Remove > dependency for > >> > concurrent.jar > >> > >>> > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> > >> > >>> > Date: Thursday, August 27, > 2009, 8:21 AM > >> > >>> > In my first email, I > pointed out > >> > >>> > several things that would > need to be > >> > changed. You can > >> > >>> > simply search for the util > concurrent > >> > import and find them > >> > >>> > all. > >> > "EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent" > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > ClockDaemon is used more > than the poooled > >> > executor. . . . > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > Yes, there is a backport > for JDK > >> > 1.4. A backport > >> > >>> > implements something > available only in a > >> > new version. > >> > >>> > In this case, the backport > is of the 1.5 > >> > concurrent > >> > >>> > library. This allows > you to compile > >> > and run in > >> > >>> > 1.4. But if you are > running 1.5 or > >> > later, you don't > >> > >>> > need to backport jar. > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > There are some subtle > changes between the > >> > two. But it > >> > >>> > should be perfectly > possible to get it > >> > working in a few > >> > >>> > days. Take a crack at > it if you > >> > want. I'll get > >> > >>> > to it in about two weeks. > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > Aaron > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > --- On Thu, 8/27/09, > Jeffrey Kesselman > >> > <jef...@gmail.com> > >> > >>> > wrote: > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > From: Jeffrey > Kesselman <jef...@gmail.com> > >> > >>> > > Subject: Re: Remove > dependency for > >> > concurrent.jar > >> > >>> > > To: "JCS Users List" > <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> > >> > >>> > > Date: Thursday, August > 27, 2009, > >> > 8:02 AM > >> > >>> > > Well i don't know the > codebase so > >> > >>> > > Aaron is your better > reference > >> > there > >> > >>> > > BUT... > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > Since the large > majority of Doug's > >> > concurrent library > >> > >>> > got > >> > >>> > > ported as is into > >> > >>> > > the JDK, Id start by > simply taking > >> > his library out of > >> > >>> > your > >> > >>> > > build path in > >> > >>> > > eclipse. Then > follow the > >> > errors and everywhere it > >> > >>> > > can't find a reference > to > >> > >>> > > a concurrent utility, > use's > >> > Eclipse's help to add the > >> > >>> > > proper import. > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > Id imagine it cant be > more then a > >> > day or two of very > >> > >>> > > mechanical work... > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > Alternately, if your a > perl type > >> > hacker you could try > >> > >>> > > writing a script that > >> > >>> > > would look for the > string that is > >> > doug's package name > >> > >>> > in > >> > >>> > > the file and > >> > >>> > > repalce it with the > JDK package. > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > JK > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 > at 10:36 AM, > >> > Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com> > >> > >>> > > wrote: > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > Hi Jeffrey and > Aaron, > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > We are currently > evaluating the > >> > effort to > >> > >>> > perform > >> > >>> > > those changes.. If > the > >> > >>> > > > effort is not > that big, I > >> > personally, would like > >> > >>> > to > >> > >>> > > make that change and > >> > >>> > > > contribute to the > community. > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > I'll need some > guideline from > >> > where to start, > >> > >>> > and > >> > >>> > > regarding that I'm > >> > >>> > > > relying > >> > >>> > > > on you guys :D > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > Which should be > the best > >> > approach to start this > >> > >>> > change > >> > >>> > > ? > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > Regards, > >> > >>> > > > Nuno > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > On Thu, Aug 27, > 2009 at 15:30, > >> > Jeffrey Kesselman > >> > >>> > > <jef...@gmail.com> > >> > >>> > > wrote: > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > The source > is available, > >> > couldn't you go > >> > >>> > through > >> > >>> > > it and change the > >> > >>> > > > > references > yourselves? > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > That seems a > lot less > >> > costly then abandoning > >> > >>> > the > >> > >>> > > whole library. > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > Maybe you > could even > >> > contribute those > >> > >>> > changes > >> > >>> > > back to the > community... > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > On Thu, Aug > 27, 2009 at > >> > 7:02 AM, Nuno > >> > >>> > Sénica > >> > >>> > > <nsen...@gmail.com> > >> > >>> > > wrote: > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > Hi > all, > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > At the > company where > >> > I work for, we > >> > >>> > have an > >> > >>> > > application which > relies on > >> > >>> > > > > JCS > >> > >>> > > > > > and it > has proven to > >> > be a good solution > >> > >>> > so > >> > >>> > > far. But now, we were > >> > >>> > > > informed > >> > >>> > > > > > about > legal issues by > >> > using concurrent > >> > >>> > lib > >> > >>> > > and we are being > instructed > >> > >>> > > > to > >> > >>> > > > > > change > the caching > >> > lib. > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > My > question is if > >> > there's any plan to > >> > >>> > use > >> > >>> > > the native concurrent > instead > >> > >>> > > > > of > >> > >>> > > > > > the lib > that JSC > >> > depend on at the > >> > >>> > moment ? > >> > >>> > > Is so, when it is > planned to > >> > >>> > > > > be > >> > >>> > > > > > > available ? > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > Thanks > in advance. > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > Regards, > >> > >>> > > > > > Nuno > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > -- > >> > >>> > > > > ~~ Microsoft > help desk > >> > says: reply hazy, > >> > >>> > ask > >> > >>> > > again later. ~~ > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > -- > >> > >>> > > ~~ Microsoft help desk > says: reply > >> > hazy, ask again > >> > >>> > later. > >> > >>> > > ~~ > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > >> > >>> > For additional commands, > e-mail: > >> jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > >> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: > jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org
