On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 6:11 AM, Oleg Nenashev <o.v.nenas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Two regressions which are not fully triaged (JENKINS-49588, JENKINS-49630) > do seem as a major problem.
Well they do look “major”, and they do seem to be regressions from something, but it is not at all obvious to me that using 2.104 instead of 2.107 would solve them. Until we find a way to reproduce from scratch, or analyze field logs more clearly, it seems premature to assume that using an earlier weekly will make the LTS better even for these users. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr1t6k9TiMe%2Bnk7R0DX%2B-4fsE1TaXG%2BmeJRv7A70m5%3D__g%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
