I like the idea of pr’s. Are you also saying that the list is available for any 
company to pr? 
I also think with the move to the CDF it will operate much like the CNCF and 
have certified service providers.
I would be good with a list where every company can pr but how does a company 
fleet validated. I see room for companies or supposed companies to abuse the 
process and ultimately the project.

> On Jan 22, 2020, at 9:06 PM, Richard Bywater <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> This seems to be along the lines of what Oleg raised mid-last year ( 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jenkinsci-dev/-1cDktjaI6A/FRT21zTqDQAJ ). 
> 
> I think that there does need to be a very clear steer that the project itself 
> runs on a voluntary basis and perhaps have a list of commercial support 
> available but I think rather than having the list as curated as such it 
> should be done in a way that commercial companies can list their details 
> (and, as I said in the previous email, make sure that its clearly said that 
> the Jenkins project doesn't endorse any of them).
> 
> I'm guessing it should be fairly simple to create a page on jenkins.io and 
> have companies provide PRs to have their company included (and, at that 
> point, whomever approves the PR needs a bit of guidance about what 
> information should/shouldn't be allowed to be provided by the company).
> 
> Richard.
> 
>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 17:32, 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hey Everyone,
>> 
>> As one of the few that regularly hang out in the users channels (#jenkins on 
>> irc, or #jenkinsci/jenkins on gitter) I was wondering how everyone felt 
>> about a central location where we can point users to for commercial support.
>> 
>> There's definitely some users who come in, ask straight forward questions, 
>> and usually pretty easy to fix ("check what version of java", "your using 
>> the wrong type of pipeline, see examples", etc) but sometimes there's 
>> definitely issues that last weeks, and its fundamental understanding of what 
>> needs to be done ("How do I CI?", "Whats wrong with this <paste 6 pages of 
>> stacktrace and no pipeline", etc)
>> 
>> So how does everyone feel of a page on jenkins.io where we can go:
>> "Looking for more support than the volunteers can offer? Looking to share 
>> sensitive info? Need help in a short amount of time? Feel free to contact 
>> any of these professional services"
>> 
>> I'm certainly conflicted at maintaining the curated list, or playing 
>> favoritism at all, but its also frustrating when after a while of bad 
>> communication you want to walk away, but they ping you, or pm you asking for 
>> more help.
>> 
>> Gavin
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAG%3D_DuskDeuV3oKOANSiKH9uB%3DyZgZyZeqxUELZ2ru-%2BbD2VYg%40mail.gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAAy0hwcPo7jFUO3OzL3MOo0hxBemACb9SVgR45BhJwQ0GFnLSQ%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/5DEDA5FA-715F-4BFE-9D1B-2CCB9CE6925F%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to