Code Owners does not prevent merges by other contributors with Write
permissions. We could combine CODEOWNERS with required reviews
<https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/enabling-required-reviews-for-pull-requests>,
but it will apply to the entire Jenkins repository.
I am not sure this is what we want, but happy to discuss it. Setting up
permissions on the repo level is easier that wrangling with a new repo and
the delivery pipeline patches


On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:07 PM Tim Jacomb <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is there a problem with using code owners for those files?
>
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 11:05, Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks to everyone involved in this discussion. I would also like to move
>> the page and to improve its look&feel. Moving the Commercial Support
>> <https://wiki.jenkins.io/display/JENKINS/Commercial+Support> and Approved
>> Trademark Usage
>> <https://wiki.jenkins.io/display/JENKINS/Approved+Trademark+Usage> pages
>> is in my backlog for Wiki migration. This pages are not easy to migrate
>> IMO, because jenkins.io grants a wide access for managing these pages
>> (Copy Editors, SIG leaders, GSoC team, etc.). Such access is supposed to be
>> restricted IMO, especially for the trademarks page. Access in Wiki was also
>> restricted at some point.
>>
>> My plan for these pages is/was to...
>>
>>    - Create a new public repository within Jenkins Infra for the
>>    sensitive content. Write permissions will be restricted to the Jenkins
>>    Infra team and to the Jenkins Board
>>    - Repository will include sensitive content, including Commercial
>>    Support, Trademarks, and maybe Governance docs in the future (once under
>>    https://jenkins.io/project/).
>>    - For Commercial Support and Approved Trademarks we will use separate
>>    Asciidoc pages for each entry.
>>    - jenkins.io builder will pull this resource and include pages into
>>    jenkins.io, similar to how it happens with currently generated content
>>
>> Would appreciate feedback about such process.
>>
>> P.S: I will make sure to create a JIRA entry for it if someone wants to
>> contribute
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 6:22:29 AM UTC+1, Marky Jackson wrote:
>>>
>>> I like the idea of waiting for the advocacy meeting but that doesn’t
>>> mean we can’t get started on a WIP pr
>>>
>>> > On Jan 22, 2020, at 9:21 PM, 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/6cc34bcb-d4b6-4f5a-a293-8c8b6f03356e%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/6cc34bcb-d4b6-4f5a-a293-8c8b6f03356e%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/vjLgQtpz06Y/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidZWKWSGL3xAbuGhkHtp02JjvFE0ze9SLag5dNuEgZ-OA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidZWKWSGL3xAbuGhkHtp02JjvFE0ze9SLag5dNuEgZ-OA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPfivLB_059-YyxN%3DP-RNPm48euCLYk61oUJDv_aMAyOkcuyMw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to