sok resep mun nilik kana symbolisasi agama ceuk karisten Yesus teh Tuhan tapi tetep aya nu ngabantah (ceuk sabagian nu percaya jadi konspirasi abadi) yen Yesus gaduh istri namina Maria Magdalena, gaduh budak istri namina Sarah disumputkeun ku 'persaudaraan rahasia' tug dugi ka ayeuna
bintang david nyutat tina simbol indung-bapa di urang aya lingga-yoni beureum bodas yin yang anu resume akhirna nyoko kana kasaimbangan keun we islamna seuna dibahas ku ahlina da ari kana symbol mah ... nyaeta ... kudu wijaksana dina nga-akrobkeun IPTEK sareng kaimanan sabab ku iptek bulan nyata ditincak ku Amstrong ... nepi ka Oma Irama ti Singaparna nyiptakeun laguna sejak manusia turun di bulan ... berubahlah bentuk rayuan perempuan tak mau dikatakan wajahnya cantik bagai bulan (naha jig2 ka raja dangdut ? heu heu) bongan kudu bukti wae ... puguh abdi mah jalma laip nya Gan Ocha nya ? hehehehehehehheheheheheheheheheheehehhehehehehehehehehehehe 2011/5/5 Roza R. Mintaredja <[email protected]> > > > > > 2010/11/26 <[email protected]> > > atheis teh, sabenerna maranehna teu ngaku ka gusti di agama anu 'aya' > (hususna agama ti timur tengah) , sabab manehna boga 'gusti sorangan > nurutkeun kayakinana' > pasti ritualna beda, kusabab hayang yakin sorangan lain gusti nurutkeun > euceuk jeung beja, kitu meureun mun rek make/maca 'basa jeung pikiran' > manehna. > saperti halna kayakinan uin, (sarua jeung sababaraha urang nu sejen malah > teu warawuh), rek nginjeum basa/tulisan the founding fathers bung karno anu > unina: > kl. "ku percaya bahwa semua manusia dimuka bumi ini ber tuhan, dalam arti > mempercayai dan menghayati akan eksistensi/keberadaannya tuhan!". > nu matak sok aya anu menyatakan dirinya, aku tidak ber agama, akan tetapi > aku ber tuhan., naha anu kitu langsung disebut atheis? sesat? > mangga teh teuing, *lakum dienukum waliyaddien* we eta mah, nu penting > henteu perlu ngagogoreng atawa melecehkan kapercayaan deungeun > sabenerna kudu kitu mun urang boga *pikiran* , *hate* jeung *rasa* *anu > lagawa* mah. > > ayeuna lamun aya urang sunda ikrar/nyebut ka eyang prabu siliwangi teh > 'nabi'na urang sunda? eta hakna. teu kudu diributkeun. > Eyang Prabu Siliwangi hiji tokoh historis, lain legenda/dongeng, tapi jadi > tokoh anu legendaris! > malah lamun uin meunang atawa boga hak negeskeun, yen saha anu ngaku sunda > tapi teu ngaku ayana/ekistensina Eyang Prabu Siliwangi > eta hartina* batal kasundaanana!!!* > * > * > euweuh tah padjadjaran, lamun euweuh siliwangi ! (*hana huni hana > mangke*jst....) > PADJADJARAN JEUNG SILIWANGI PUGUH SUMBER SAJARAHNA. > nu matak palebah dieu, anu ku urang ayeuna disawalakeun mah, lain dina hal > eksistensi Padjadjaran, jeung Siliwangi > tapi dina hal pasualan nu can dirojong ku pakta kuat atawa can kapanggih > sumber sajarah nu nguatkeunana. > hartina masih ngamungkinkeun tapsiran anyar luyu jeung teori, metodologi > jeung pakta anyar. > cindekna mah loba keneh data data anu nambahan atawa ngadukung > eksistensina. > data ti urang 'bule': > Tome Pires (abad 15), Ten Dam (1957), Friederich (1853), Hageman (1867), > Holle (1867; 1869), Noorduyn (1959;1962), Pleyte (1911; 1914; 1915) > data ti urg indon: > Sutaarga(1965), Atja( 1968; 1970; 1972); Poerbatjaraka((1921), Saleh > Danasasmita(1975; 1983; 2003; 2006; 2006) > Sumber sajarahna diantarana: > Carita Parahyangan; Carita Purwaka; Bujangga Manik; Sang Hyang Siksa Kanda > ng kaResian. > jadi dina ahir abad ka 15 atw dina awal abad ka 16 nu ngaran Siliwangi teh > geus kakoncara, geus jadi kacapangan urang sunda. > malah ka beh ditu nakeun... > hn*R3m > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hehehe punten kang, ari pangeran mah sadayana ege ngangken aya, kajaba >> atheis tea.. Ari siliwangi mah cenah manusa, mahluk biasa, nu sabagean sunda >> nyebat eta kungsi aya, sabagean nyebat eta ukur dongeng.. Janten teu tiasa >> dibandingkeun.. Nu ngabanding2keun nya teu nyambung tea >> >> Powered by Telkomsel BlackBerry® >> ------------------------------ >> *From: * Ilen Kardani <[email protected]> >> *Sender: * [email protected] >> *Date: *Fri, 26 Nov 2010 17:50:39 +0800 >> *To: *[email protected]<[email protected]> >> *ReplyTo: * [email protected] >> *Cc: *[email protected]<[email protected]> >> *Subject: *Re: [kisunda] Inohong - Pamanggih Stepen Hawking ngeunaan >> Pangeran >> >> >> >> Sugan teh kang halimun bakal nanya, "naon buktina yen Pangeran nu >> nyiptakeun makhluk? "Ari ukur katulis tina buku mah teu bisa cukup jadi >> bukti pan? Kumaha lamun nu nulis bukuna salah? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Nov 26, 2010, at 14:27, Aschev Schuraschev <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Saha nu nyiptakeun mahluk? Jalma-jalma nu ariman mah pasti ngaku yen >> Pangeran nu nyiptakeun mahluk (kaasup alam jagat raya katut hukum alamna). >> Hawking jelas pisan percaya yen jagat raya diatur ku hukum alam. >> >> Lamun ditanya "saha nu nyiptakeun hukum alam?" Sanajan atheis, Hawking oge >> masih mangmang, manehna teu bisa ngajawab kalayan pasti. Tapi manehna boga >> anggapan yen hukum alam kasebut mungkin diparentah ku Pangeran ngan Pangeran >> henteu ngalakukeun intervensi pikeun ngeureunkeun >> (ngareksak/ngarempak/ngamusnahkeun) hukum alam kasebut. >> >> Nya heueuh atuh. Pan dina Islam diajarkeun yen Pangeran boga sifat >> "berkehendak". Nepi ka iraha wae Pangeran bade ngahirupkeun eta hukum alam, >> eta mah urusan Mantenna. Iraha Pangeran bade ngancurkeun hukum alam >> (intervensi kana hukum alam), eta oge urusan mantenna. Kabeneran wae ayeuna >> urang aya dina mangsa Pangeran masih ngahirupkeun hukum alam. >> >> >> Religious views >> >> Throughout his early work, Hawking used the word "God" in metaphorical >> meanings but also suggested the existence of God was unnecessary to explain >> the origin of the universe, as discussed in *A Brief History of >> Time<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Brief_History_of_Time> >> *.[53] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking#cite_note-52> However, >> his newest book *The Grand >> Design<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Design_(book)> >> *, as well as interviews with the Telegraph and the Channel 4 documentary >> Genius of Britain, clarify that he does "not believe in a personal God."[ >> 54] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking#cite_note-53> Hawking >> writes, "The question is: is the way the universe began chosen by God for >> reasons we can't understand, or was it determined by a law of science? I >> believe the second." Hawking adds, "Because there is a law such as gravity, >> the Universe can and will create itself from nothing." Graham Farmello of >> the Telegraph writes, "God did not create the universe, Stephen Hawking >> revealed."[55]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking#cite_note-54> >> [56] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking#cite_note-55> >> >> His ex-wife, Jane said during their divorce proceedings that he was an >> atheist >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheist>.[57]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking#cite_note-56> >> [58] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking#cite_note-57> Hawking >> has stated that he is "*not religious in the normal sense*" and he >> believes that "*the universe is governed by the laws of science. The laws >> may have been decreed by God, but God does not intervene to break the laws. >> *"[59]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking#cite_note-sciencenews1-58> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- ................. 8-| 8| B-| B|
