Hi Andrea and Ahmad,
I guess both points are reasonable while are on the opposite site.
Teamwork should be done as Andrea wrote. But in the special case if one
user should be allowed to accept their (his/her) own suggestions, a
'collective acception from the others' shoould make this option
available. /Not aiming any infrastructure change, it just seemss logical
for me./
On the other hand in case of there is only one translator, this option
is necessary by default, since who else should accept their (his/her)
suggestions (if no one else speaks the given language at that time)?
Regards,
csaba
On 2018-02-09 12:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Ahmad Alawsie wrote:
The thing is if i, skyray1, accepted the suggestion by skyray1, it
will submit the translation and other users will not be able to see
that suggestion as that string becomes officially translated unless
someone decides to change it.
Yes, and this is exactly my example. Imagine you have two translators
into Arabic, skyray1 and xyz.
1. User skyray1 enters suggestions, deliberately keeping them as
suggestions (for the reason above).
2. User xyz reviews them and tells (by e-mail) skyray1 to go ahead
(and let's say he leaves the final acceptance to skyray1, as skyray1
has best knowledge of that set of strings).
3. At this point, skyray1 goes back to his own suggestions and accepts
them.
This is a reasonable workflow used by Pootle teams, and step 3
explains why it is useful to have this. It if still doesn't make sense
to you, this is still the way other teams work, so there is no reason
to break it.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
