I'm putting my vote in for github. On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Raju Bitter < [email protected]> wrote:
> Tucker, are you going to set up a Git repository for the OpenLaszlo > source code? I've just seen that you can use Git with sourceforge as > well: > http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Git > > http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Classic%20vs%20Beta%20projects/ > SourceForge.net<http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Classic%20vs%20Beta%20projects/%0ASourceForge.net>provides > the following features in its Git offering: > > All 1.6.x features of git are supported. > Developer (read/write) access is provided via ssh. > anonymous (read-only) access are provided via git's daemon > protocol ("git://"). > Several Git clients are supported, including: > The official git client (MS Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, BSD). > Repositories may be viewed via web browser using the GitWeb. > Existing repositories may be imported via a normal git push (since > git is a distributed SCM). > Repository access may be granted or revoked from a developer using > the Project Admin interface. > Repository backups and mirroring may be performed using rsync or git > clone. > Service usage is not restricted by quotas. > Multiple repositories are supported. > > But I have no experience with Git and sourceforge. As an alternative, > Github could be used (open source projects should be free). > > What do you think the next steps should be? I'm not willing to > approach Laszlo, the company has let so many opportunities pass to > talk to the community, that they have lost any credibility with me. > But I can imagine that some of you have better connections to the > management team. > > - Raju > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Raju Bitter > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, will do. :-) > > > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Ono Keiji <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Raju, > >> > >> If you will have an online meeting, let me know the time. > >> > >> - ono > >> > >> > >> 引用 Raju Bitter <[email protected]>： > >> > >> > >>> @Tucker: Yes, would be good to use that domain for now. Don't know if > >>> we should use OpenLaszlo at all as a name. > >>> > >>> I haven't heard anything from Laszlo. I'd be surprised if there would > >>> be any official response. > >>> > >>> It seems like there is still a number of people using OpenLaszlo, and > >>> some more with general interest in the technology. OpenLaszlo is still > >>> mentioned on the IBM Websphere Commerce edition website: > >>> goo.gl/qT6iu > >>> "WebSphere Commerce features compiling OpenLaszlo applications, > >>> including an editor for OpenLaszlo files and a compilation process." > >>> > >>> If each of us would reach out to their OpenLaszlo network, to find out > >>> who'd be interested in working on or contributing to OpenLaszlo hosted > >>> at Github (maybe even under a new name), that might helpful. Once we > >>> have identified a circle of community members interested in the > >>> project, we could come up with an agenda for an online meeting to > >>> discuss the next steps. What do you think? > >>> > >>> - Raju > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:17 PM, David Greisen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> So this thread has been going for several days. Has there been any > >>>> response > >>>> from Laszlo Systems? At what point should we start scraping the > listserve > >>>> archives and forums? > >>>> > >>>> David > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:37 PM, James Simister <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks Tucker and Sarah, > >>>>> > >>>>> Lol, I read it as OLD dev as well. > >>>>> > >>>>> Bret > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Dec 07, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Sarah Allen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Funny -- I read that as OLD dev at first glance. Ok for the interim, > but > >>>>> we gotta work on naming if change domains... my guess is that Laszlo > >>>>> will > >>>>> appreciate the volunteer support :) > >>>>> > >>>>> On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:21 AM, P T Withington wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > If it's of any interest, I have a domain oldev.org that I set > aside > >>>>> > should openlaszlo.org become non-functional. Let me know if you > want > >>>>> > to use > >>>>> > it. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > On 2011-12-06, at 01:44, Raju Bitter wrote: > >>>>> > > >>>>> >> Thanks a lot Sarah, I like the more positive thread title. > Actually > >>>>> >> it > >>>>> >> would be cool to continue OL on Github. I've created a lot of > useful > >>>>> >> code in the past years, and I'd be much more happy to contribute > the > >>>>> >> code to an independent project. > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> @Max: You once said that you have created a script for updating > >>>>> >> Github? Do you still have that somewhere? > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> Thanks, > >>>>> >> Raju > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Sarah Allen < > [email protected]> > >>>>> >> wrote: > >>>>> >>> Thanks for starting this thread I'm re-naming it to be a bit more > >>>>> >>> positive. I'd like to see it as an "organization" on github then > it > >>>>> >>> is > >>>>> >>> easier for a few of us to be administrators. > >>>>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> Sarah > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> On Dec 5, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Raju Bitter wrote: > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>> Thanks, Tucker. It's good to know that the source is available > on > >>>>> >>>> sourceforge, thanks for making that happen. I think Max has a > >>>>> >>>> script > >>>>> >>>> somewhere to update his Github repository: > >>>>> >>>> https://github.com/mcarlson/openlaszlo > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>>> From what I'm hearing there's still enough interest in the > >>>>> >>>>> technology > >>>>> >>>> to have an active community do basic maintenance work, in case > >>>>> >>>> Laszlo > >>>>> >>>> is not interested in or capable of doing that in the future. > Maybe > >>>>> >>>> it's time to reach out to the active community members to see if > >>>>> >>>> there's enough momentum to continue development on either > >>>>> >>>> sourceforge > >>>>> >>>> or Github. > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:00 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> > >>>>> >>>> wrote: > >>>>> >>>>> It worries me to At least there is a mirror of the sources on > >>>>> >>>>> sourceforge. Sorry I didn't get one on github. > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 5, 2011, at 2:04, Raju Bitter > >>>>> >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>> It seems that Laszlo finally stopped working on OpenLaszlo. > There > >>>>> >>>>>> haven't been any checkins to the platform since October 21st > >>>>> >>>>>> 2011. > >>>>> >>>>>> And > >>>>> >>>>>> there haven't been any nightly builds since the same day. > >>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>> Based on the mailing list activity in the past months, the > team > >>>>> >>>>>> size > >>>>> >>>>>> must be down to 1-2 people, probably not working full-time on > the > >>>>> >>>>>> project - if at all. As a long time supporter, contributor, > >>>>> >>>>>> committer > >>>>> >>>>>> I'd appreciate an update on the status of the project. > >>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>> I don't care about a specific release date for 5.0. But does > that > >>>>> >>>>>> mean > >>>>> >>>>>> that Laszlo discontinues OpenLaszlo? > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ------------------------------------------ > >> Ono Keiji > >> [email protected] > >> Mizue Edogawa Tokyo JP > >> URL http://www.net8.co.jp > >> ------------------------------------------ > >> > >
