Seems like we could just move to the simpler pull-request model. On Dec 20, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Raju Bitter wrote:
> Just running the 4-5 lines of Git code Max has sent us to import the > code into a Git repository to get started. The other questions is, how > would contributions be handled, since the whole way commits are > processes is SVN based. Not sure if that's compatible with Git. > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Sarah Allen <[email protected]> wrote: >> sorry -- meant to send this to everyone, but sent the response just to >> David! >> >> +1 for github -- I really like the forking feature with very nice support >> for pull-requests >> >> I ran into Chris Helgeson from Laszlo Systems the other day. He says that >> he welcomes contributions from the community. They have a few engineers on >> staff who work on the platform and I think there are more contributors who >> don't work for Laszlo Systems now. >> >> What's involved in switching over? >> >> Sarah >> >> >> On Dec 16, 2011, at 10:48 AM, David Greisen wrote: >> >> I'm putting my vote in for github. >> >> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Raju Bitter >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Tucker, are you going to set up a Git repository for the OpenLaszlo >>> source code? I've just seen that you can use Git with sourceforge as >>> well: >>> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Git >>> >>> http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Classic%20vs%20Beta%20projects/ >>> SourceForge.net provides the following features in its Git offering: >>> >>> All 1.6.x features of git are supported. >>> Developer (read/write) access is provided via ssh. >>> anonymous (read-only) access are provided via git's daemon >>> protocol ("git://"). >>> Several Git clients are supported, including: >>> The official git client (MS Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, BSD). >>> Repositories may be viewed via web browser using the GitWeb. >>> Existing repositories may be imported via a normal git push (since >>> git is a distributed SCM). >>> Repository access may be granted or revoked from a developer using >>> the Project Admin interface. >>> Repository backups and mirroring may be performed using rsync or git >>> clone. >>> Service usage is not restricted by quotas. >>> Multiple repositories are supported. >>> >>> But I have no experience with Git and sourceforge. As an alternative, >>> Github could be used (open source projects should be free). >>> >>> What do you think the next steps should be? I'm not willing to >>> approach Laszlo, the company has let so many opportunities pass to >>> talk to the community, that they have lost any credibility with me. >>> But I can imagine that some of you have better connections to the >>> management team. >>> >>> - Raju >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Raju Bitter >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Thanks, will do. :-) >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Ono Keiji <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi Raju, >>>>> >>>>> If you will have an online meeting, let me know the time. >>>>> >>>>> - ono >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 引用 Raju Bitter <[email protected]>： >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> @Tucker: Yes, would be good to use that domain for now. Don't know if >>>>>> we should use OpenLaszlo at all as a name. >>>>>> >>>>>> I haven't heard anything from Laszlo. I'd be surprised if there would >>>>>> be any official response. >>>>>> >>>>>> It seems like there is still a number of people using OpenLaszlo, and >>>>>> some more with general interest in the technology. OpenLaszlo is still >>>>>> mentioned on the IBM Websphere Commerce edition website: >>>>>> goo.gl/qT6iu >>>>>> "WebSphere Commerce features compiling OpenLaszlo applications, >>>>>> including an editor for OpenLaszlo files and a compilation process." >>>>>> >>>>>> If each of us would reach out to their OpenLaszlo network, to find out >>>>>> who'd be interested in working on or contributing to OpenLaszlo hosted >>>>>> at Github (maybe even under a new name), that might helpful. Once we >>>>>> have identified a circle of community members interested in the >>>>>> project, we could come up with an agenda for an online meeting to >>>>>> discuss the next steps. What do you think? >>>>>> >>>>>> - Raju >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:17 PM, David Greisen <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So this thread has been going for several days. Has there been any >>>>>>> response >>>>>>> from Laszlo Systems? At what point should we start scraping the >>>>>>> listserve >>>>>>> archives and forums? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> David >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:37 PM, James Simister <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Tucker and Sarah, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lol, I read it as OLD dev as well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bret >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 07, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Sarah Allen <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Funny -- I read that as OLD dev at first glance. Ok for the interim, >>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>> we gotta work on naming if change domains... my guess is that Laszlo >>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>> appreciate the volunteer support :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:21 AM, P T Withington wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If it's of any interest, I have a domain oldev.org that I set >>>>>>>>> aside >>>>>>>>> should openlaszlo.org become non-functional. Let me know if you >>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>> to use >>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2011-12-06, at 01:44, Raju Bitter wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Sarah, I like the more positive thread title. >>>>>>>>>> Actually >>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>> would be cool to continue OL on Github. I've created a lot of >>>>>>>>>> useful >>>>>>>>>> code in the past years, and I'd be much more happy to contribute >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> code to an independent project. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> @Max: You once said that you have created a script for updating >>>>>>>>>> Github? Do you still have that somewhere? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Raju >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Sarah Allen >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for starting this thread I'm re-naming it to be a bit >>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>> positive. I'd like to see it as an "organization" on github then >>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>> easier for a few of us to be administrators. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sarah >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 5, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Raju Bitter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Tucker. It's good to know that the source is available >>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>> sourceforge, thanks for making that happen. I think Max has a >>>>>>>>>>>> script >>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere to update his Github repository: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/mcarlson/openlaszlo >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> From what I'm hearing there's still enough interest in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> technology >>>>>>>>>>>> to have an active community do basic maintenance work, in case >>>>>>>>>>>> Laszlo >>>>>>>>>>>> is not interested in or capable of doing that in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe >>>>>>>>>>>> it's time to reach out to the active community members to see >>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>> there's enough momentum to continue development on either >>>>>>>>>>>> sourceforge >>>>>>>>>>>> or Github. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:00 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> It worries me to At least there is a mirror of the sources on >>>>>>>>>>>>> sourceforge. Sorry I didn't get one on github. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 5, 2011, at 2:04, Raju Bitter >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems that Laszlo finally stopped working on OpenLaszlo. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There >>>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't been any checkins to the platform since October 21st >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2011. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there haven't been any nightly builds since the same day. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the mailing list activity in the past months, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> team >>>>>>>>>>>>>> size >>>>>>>>>>>>>> must be down to 1-2 people, probably not working full-time on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> project - if at all. As a long time supporter, contributor, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> committer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd appreciate an update on the status of the project. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care about a specific release date for 5.0. But does >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mean >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Laszlo discontinues OpenLaszlo? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> ------------------------------------------ >>>>> Ono Keiji >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> Mizue Edogawa Tokyo JP >>>>> URL http://www.net8.co.jp >>>>> ------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>> >> >>
