*Seems like we could just move to the simpler pull-request model.* I think so too, although not sure who will be able to accept/reject a push-request to the main repository in Git then. Would be nice if we could organize some people that fill that role permanently. At the moment it seems to me a bit like a "power vacuum".
Sebastian 2011/12/21 Sarah Allen <[email protected]>: > Seems like we could just move to the simpler pull-request model. > > On Dec 20, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Raju Bitter wrote: > >> Just running the 4-5 lines of Git code Max has sent us to import the >> code into a Git repository to get started. The other questions is, how >> would contributions be handled, since the whole way commits are >> processes is SVN based. Not sure if that's compatible with Git. >> >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Sarah Allen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> sorry -- meant to send this to everyone, but sent the response just to >>> David! >>> >>> +1 for github -- I really like the forking feature with very nice support >>> for pull-requests >>> >>> I ran into Chris Helgeson from Laszlo Systems the other day. He says that >>> he welcomes contributions from the community. They have a few engineers on >>> staff who work on the platform and I think there are more contributors who >>> don't work for Laszlo Systems now. >>> >>> What's involved in switching over? >>> >>> Sarah >>> >>> >>> On Dec 16, 2011, at 10:48 AM, David Greisen wrote: >>> >>> I'm putting my vote in for github. >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Raju Bitter >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Tucker, are you going to set up a Git repository for the OpenLaszlo >>>> source code? I've just seen that you can use Git with sourceforge as >>>> well: >>>> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Git >>>> >>>> http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Classic%20vs%20Beta%20projects/ >>>> SourceForge.net provides the following features in its Git offering: >>>> >>>> All 1.6.x features of git are supported. >>>> Developer (read/write) access is provided via ssh. >>>> anonymous (read-only) access are provided via git's daemon >>>> protocol ("git://"). >>>> Several Git clients are supported, including: >>>> The official git client (MS Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, BSD). >>>> Repositories may be viewed via web browser using the GitWeb. >>>> Existing repositories may be imported via a normal git push (since >>>> git is a distributed SCM). >>>> Repository access may be granted or revoked from a developer using >>>> the Project Admin interface. >>>> Repository backups and mirroring may be performed using rsync or git >>>> clone. >>>> Service usage is not restricted by quotas. >>>> Multiple repositories are supported. >>>> >>>> But I have no experience with Git and sourceforge. As an alternative, >>>> Github could be used (open source projects should be free). >>>> >>>> What do you think the next steps should be? I'm not willing to >>>> approach Laszlo, the company has let so many opportunities pass to >>>> talk to the community, that they have lost any credibility with me. >>>> But I can imagine that some of you have better connections to the >>>> management team. >>>> >>>> - Raju >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Raju Bitter >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Thanks, will do. :-) >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Ono Keiji <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Raju, >>>>>> >>>>>> If you will have an online meeting, let me know the time. >>>>>> >>>>>> - ono >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 引用 Raju Bitter <[email protected]>： >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> @Tucker: Yes, would be good to use that domain for now. Don't know if >>>>>>> we should use OpenLaszlo at all as a name. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I haven't heard anything from Laszlo. I'd be surprised if there would >>>>>>> be any official response. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It seems like there is still a number of people using OpenLaszlo, and >>>>>>> some more with general interest in the technology. OpenLaszlo is still >>>>>>> mentioned on the IBM Websphere Commerce edition website: >>>>>>> goo.gl/qT6iu >>>>>>> "WebSphere Commerce features compiling OpenLaszlo applications, >>>>>>> including an editor for OpenLaszlo files and a compilation process." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If each of us would reach out to their OpenLaszlo network, to find out >>>>>>> who'd be interested in working on or contributing to OpenLaszlo hosted >>>>>>> at Github (maybe even under a new name), that might helpful. Once we >>>>>>> have identified a circle of community members interested in the >>>>>>> project, we could come up with an agenda for an online meeting to >>>>>>> discuss the next steps. What do you think? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Raju >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:17 PM, David Greisen <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So this thread has been going for several days. Has there been any >>>>>>>> response >>>>>>>> from Laszlo Systems? At what point should we start scraping the >>>>>>>> listserve >>>>>>>> archives and forums? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:37 PM, James Simister <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Tucker and Sarah, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lol, I read it as OLD dev as well. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bret >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 07, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Sarah Allen <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Funny -- I read that as OLD dev at first glance. Ok for the interim, >>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>> we gotta work on naming if change domains... my guess is that Laszlo >>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>> appreciate the volunteer support :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:21 AM, P T Withington wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If it's of any interest, I have a domain oldev.org that I set >>>>>>>>>> aside >>>>>>>>>> should openlaszlo.org become non-functional. Let me know if you >>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>> to use >>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2011-12-06, at 01:44, Raju Bitter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Sarah, I like the more positive thread title. >>>>>>>>>>> Actually >>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>> would be cool to continue OL on Github. I've created a lot of >>>>>>>>>>> useful >>>>>>>>>>> code in the past years, and I'd be much more happy to contribute >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> code to an independent project. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> @Max: You once said that you have created a script for updating >>>>>>>>>>> Github? Do you still have that somewhere? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> Raju >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Sarah Allen >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for starting this thread I'm re-naming it to be a bit >>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>> positive. I'd like to see it as an "organization" on github then >>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>> easier for a few of us to be administrators. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sarah >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 5, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Raju Bitter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Tucker. It's good to know that the source is available >>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>> sourceforge, thanks for making that happen. I think Max has a >>>>>>>>>>>>> script >>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere to update his Github repository: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/mcarlson/openlaszlo >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From what I'm hearing there's still enough interest in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> technology >>>>>>>>>>>>> to have an active community do basic maintenance work, in case >>>>>>>>>>>>> Laszlo >>>>>>>>>>>>> is not interested in or capable of doing that in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's time to reach out to the active community members to see >>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>> there's enough momentum to continue development on either >>>>>>>>>>>>> sourceforge >>>>>>>>>>>>> or Github. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:00 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It worries me to At least there is a mirror of the sources on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sourceforge. Sorry I didn't get one on github. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 5, 2011, at 2:04, Raju Bitter >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems that Laszlo finally stopped working on OpenLaszlo. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't been any checkins to the platform since October 21st >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2011. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there haven't been any nightly builds since the same day. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the mailing list activity in the past months, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> team >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> size >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must be down to 1-2 people, probably not working full-time on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project - if at all. As a long time supporter, contributor, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd appreciate an update on the status of the project. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care about a specific release date for 5.0. But does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mean >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Laszlo discontinues OpenLaszlo? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> ------------------------------------------ >>>>>> Ono Keiji >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> Mizue Edogawa Tokyo JP >>>>>> URL http://www.net8.co.jp >>>>>> ------------------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> > > -- Sebastian Wagner http://www.openmeetings.de http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/ http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com [email protected]
