Yes I can set OpenLaszlo Nightly Build up at: http://nightly.openmeetings.de/hudson/
Sebastian 2011/12/21 Sarah Allen <[email protected]>: > I think there are still a bunch of folks who have spent years working on > OpenLaszlo who would likely be willing to accept pull requests. With github > organizations, it can be a team of people. I think the main thing that would > make it sane is have a continuous integration server -- we would need to be > running whatever tests that can be automated on each checkin. I've had very > good experience with Jenkins -- did you say you had a server you could set up > for hosting builds? > > Thanks! > Sarah > > On Dec 21, 2011, at 1:06 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> *Seems like we could just move to the simpler pull-request model.* >> I think so too, although not sure who will be able to accept/reject a >> push-request to the main repository in Git then. Would be nice if we >> could organize some people that fill that role permanently. At the >> moment it seems to me a bit like a "power vacuum". >> >> Sebastian >> >> >> 2011/12/21 Sarah Allen <[email protected]>: >>> Seems like we could just move to the simpler pull-request model. >>> >>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Raju Bitter wrote: >>> >>>> Just running the 4-5 lines of Git code Max has sent us to import the >>>> code into a Git repository to get started. The other questions is, how >>>> would contributions be handled, since the whole way commits are >>>> processes is SVN based. Not sure if that's compatible with Git. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Sarah Allen <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> sorry -- meant to send this to everyone, but sent the response just to >>>>> David! >>>>> >>>>> +1 for github -- I really like the forking feature with very nice support >>>>> for pull-requests >>>>> >>>>> I ran into Chris Helgeson from Laszlo Systems the other day. He says that >>>>> he welcomes contributions from the community. They have a few engineers >>>>> on >>>>> staff who work on the platform and I think there are more contributors who >>>>> don't work for Laszlo Systems now. >>>>> >>>>> What's involved in switching over? >>>>> >>>>> Sarah >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 16, 2011, at 10:48 AM, David Greisen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm putting my vote in for github. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Raju Bitter >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Tucker, are you going to set up a Git repository for the OpenLaszlo >>>>>> source code? I've just seen that you can use Git with sourceforge as >>>>>> well: >>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Git >>>>>> >>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Classic%20vs%20Beta%20projects/ >>>>>> SourceForge.net provides the following features in its Git offering: >>>>>> >>>>>> All 1.6.x features of git are supported. >>>>>> Developer (read/write) access is provided via ssh. >>>>>> anonymous (read-only) access are provided via git's daemon >>>>>> protocol ("git://"). >>>>>> Several Git clients are supported, including: >>>>>> The official git client (MS Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, BSD). >>>>>> Repositories may be viewed via web browser using the GitWeb. >>>>>> Existing repositories may be imported via a normal git push (since >>>>>> git is a distributed SCM). >>>>>> Repository access may be granted or revoked from a developer using >>>>>> the Project Admin interface. >>>>>> Repository backups and mirroring may be performed using rsync or git >>>>>> clone. >>>>>> Service usage is not restricted by quotas. >>>>>> Multiple repositories are supported. >>>>>> >>>>>> But I have no experience with Git and sourceforge. As an alternative, >>>>>> Github could be used (open source projects should be free). >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you think the next steps should be? I'm not willing to >>>>>> approach Laszlo, the company has let so many opportunities pass to >>>>>> talk to the community, that they have lost any credibility with me. >>>>>> But I can imagine that some of you have better connections to the >>>>>> management team. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Raju >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Raju Bitter >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Thanks, will do. :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Ono Keiji <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Raju, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you will have an online meeting, let me know the time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - ono >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 引用 Raju Bitter <[email protected]>： >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @Tucker: Yes, would be good to use that domain for now. Don't know if >>>>>>>>> we should use OpenLaszlo at all as a name. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I haven't heard anything from Laszlo. I'd be surprised if there would >>>>>>>>> be any official response. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It seems like there is still a number of people using OpenLaszlo, and >>>>>>>>> some more with general interest in the technology. OpenLaszlo is still >>>>>>>>> mentioned on the IBM Websphere Commerce edition website: >>>>>>>>> goo.gl/qT6iu >>>>>>>>> "WebSphere Commerce features compiling OpenLaszlo applications, >>>>>>>>> including an editor for OpenLaszlo files and a compilation process." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If each of us would reach out to their OpenLaszlo network, to find out >>>>>>>>> who'd be interested in working on or contributing to OpenLaszlo hosted >>>>>>>>> at Github (maybe even under a new name), that might helpful. Once we >>>>>>>>> have identified a circle of community members interested in the >>>>>>>>> project, we could come up with an agenda for an online meeting to >>>>>>>>> discuss the next steps. What do you think? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Raju >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:17 PM, David Greisen <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So this thread has been going for several days. Has there been any >>>>>>>>>> response >>>>>>>>>> from Laszlo Systems? At what point should we start scraping the >>>>>>>>>> listserve >>>>>>>>>> archives and forums? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:37 PM, James Simister <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Tucker and Sarah, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Lol, I read it as OLD dev as well. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bret >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 07, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Sarah Allen <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Funny -- I read that as OLD dev at first glance. Ok for the interim, >>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>> we gotta work on naming if change domains... my guess is that Laszlo >>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>> appreciate the volunteer support :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:21 AM, P T Withington wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If it's of any interest, I have a domain oldev.org that I set >>>>>>>>>>>> aside >>>>>>>>>>>> should openlaszlo.org become non-functional. Let me know if you >>>>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>>>> to use >>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2011-12-06, at 01:44, Raju Bitter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Sarah, I like the more positive thread title. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually >>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>> would be cool to continue OL on Github. I've created a lot of >>>>>>>>>>>>> useful >>>>>>>>>>>>> code in the past years, and I'd be much more happy to contribute >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> code to an independent project. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> @Max: You once said that you have created a script for updating >>>>>>>>>>>>> Github? Do you still have that somewhere? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Raju >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Sarah Allen >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for starting this thread I'm re-naming it to be a bit >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>>> positive. I'd like to see it as an "organization" on github then >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> easier for a few of us to be administrators. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sarah >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 5, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Raju Bitter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Tucker. It's good to know that the source is available >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sourceforge, thanks for making that happen. I think Max has a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere to update his Github repository: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/mcarlson/openlaszlo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From what I'm hearing there's still enough interest in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technology >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to have an active community do basic maintenance work, in case >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Laszlo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not interested in or capable of doing that in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's time to reach out to the active community members to see >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's enough momentum to continue development on either >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sourceforge >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or Github. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:00 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It worries me to At least there is a mirror of the sources on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sourceforge. Sorry I didn't get one on github. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 5, 2011, at 2:04, Raju Bitter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems that Laszlo finally stopped working on OpenLaszlo. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't been any checkins to the platform since October 21st >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2011. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there haven't been any nightly builds since the same day. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the mailing list activity in the past months, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> team >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> size >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must be down to 1-2 people, probably not working full-time on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project - if at all. As a long time supporter, contributor, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd appreciate an update on the status of the project. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care about a specific release date for 5.0. But does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mean >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Laszlo discontinues OpenLaszlo? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> Ono Keiji >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> Mizue Edogawa Tokyo JP >>>>>>>> URL http://www.net8.co.jp >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sebastian Wagner >> http://www.openmeetings.de >> http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/ >> http://www.webbase-design.de >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >> [email protected] > > -- Sebastian Wagner http://www.openmeetings.de http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/ http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com [email protected]
