Danny Backx wrote:
> Run 'ldd src/xmgrace' to find out. You should, but you won't,
> see reference to /usr/local/lesstif/lib/libXm.so.* if I am right.
libXbae.so.4 and libXm.so.1 are against lesstif. All others are not.
See below.
[I'm doing exactly the same as I've done with more previous versions
of LessTif; I've been away for 8 weeks, last version I've used was
0.91.8].
Alexander Mai wrote:
> - what does 'ldd src/xmgrace' say?
> (I think ldd is the 'final' answer, while some config files may not contain
> the complete info, -> LD_LIBRARY_PATH, etc.?!)
libXbae.so.4 => /usr/local/lesstif/lib/libXbae.so.4 (0x4001d000)
libXm.so.1 => /usr/local/lesstif/lib/libXm.so.1 (0x4005c000)
libXpm.so.4 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x4017c000)
libXp.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 (0x4018a000)
libXmu.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0x40193000)
libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x401a6000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x401f0000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x401fc000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x402a0000)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x402aa000)
libtiff.so.3 => /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3 (0x402c2000)
libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x40305000)
libpng.so.2 => /usr/lib/libpng.so.2 (0x40324000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x4034e000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4035d000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4037a000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4037f000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
> - the grace build was a clean one; you did not just re-configure and
> re-make w/o a 'make clean' and related in advance?
Yes, I've built it from scratch.
> Final remark: it's usually not a good idea to the CVS version anyway.
I always keep a working (non-cvs) version of lesstif.
I send this partially to give some feedback on how CVS performs
"in the field". Does that help?
Thanks,
Rob.
