On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:46:04PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
> > Run 'ldd src/xmgrace' to find out. You should, but you won't,
> > see reference to /usr/local/lesstif/lib/libXm.so.* if I am right.
>
> libXbae.so.4 and libXm.so.1 are against lesstif. All others are not.
> See below.
> [I'm doing exactly the same as I've done with more previous versions
> of LessTif; I've been away for 8 weeks, last version I've used was
> 0.91.8].
>
> Alexander Mai wrote:
> > - what does 'ldd src/xmgrace' say?
> > (I think ldd is the 'final' answer, while some config files may not contain
> > the complete info, -> LD_LIBRARY_PATH, etc.?!)
>
> libXbae.so.4 => /usr/local/lesstif/lib/libXbae.so.4 (0x4001d000)
> libXm.so.1 => /usr/local/lesstif/lib/libXm.so.1 (0x4005c000)
^^^^^^^^^^
> libXpm.so.4 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x4017c000)
> libXp.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 (0x4018a000)
> libXmu.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0x40193000)
> libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x401a6000)
> libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x401f0000)
> libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x401fc000)
> libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x402a0000)
> libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x402aa000)
> libtiff.so.3 => /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3 (0x402c2000)
> libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x40305000)
> libpng.so.2 => /usr/lib/libpng.so.2 (0x40324000)
> libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x4034e000)
> libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4035d000)
> libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4037a000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4037f000)
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
If I remember you're configure command you did not specify
any version of LessTif to be build.
Current CVS - as I also just verified - does install a 2.0
version of the libs, this would be libXm.so.2 not libXm.so.1 !!
> > - the grace build was a clean one; you did not just re-configure and
> > re-make w/o a 'make clean' and related in advance?
>
> Yes, I've built it from scratch.
Fine.
But still does not explain why the wrong libXm is either
installed or linked %-\
> > Final remark: it's usually not a good idea to the CVS version anyway.
> I always keep a working (non-cvs) version of lesstif.
> I send this partially to give some feedback on how CVS performs
> "in the field". Does that help?
>
> Thanks,
> Rob.
Yes.
If I wrote 'is not a good idea' this should translate to:
if people use this for daily work (like I in fact do) we
will get bug reports as soon as possible which is fine&helpful.
But it also means: you might get the answer 'we know it's
broken, and won't fix it this week' (unlikely, but
not impossible). And we will silently ignore reports like
'NEdit crashed with LessTif/CVS and my 1723 pages big
document was lost' :-)
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
