On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:33:51 GMT, Martin Simmons wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:07:11 +0100, Alexander Mai
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Alexander> Unfortunately we might have an even worse transition in future when
> Alexander> we go from our so-called Motif 2.0 to 2.1 by default: both libs might be
>referenced
> Alexander> as libXm.so.2, but will be binary incompatible ...
>
>Apart from things new in 2.1, is 2.1 supposed to be source-compatible with
>2.0? If so, why bother building 2.0 at all?
Well, our 2.0 is not a real 2.0 - it lacks 2.x stuff except C++ support and CSText.
So idea is to integrate missing 2.x stuff in our 2.1 which will become
our default version when addition is finished ...
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
