On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 07:05:54PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Alexander Mai wrote:
> > > libXbae.so.4 => /usr/local/lesstif/lib/libXbae.so.4 (0x4001d000)
> > > libXm.so.1 => /usr/local/lesstif/lib/libXm.so.1 (0x4005c000)
> > ^^^^^^^^^^
> > If I remember you're configure command you did not specify
> > any version of LessTif to be build.
> > Current CVS - as I also just verified - does install a 2.0
> > version of the libs, this would be libXm.so.2 not libXm.so.1 !!
>
> I've configured as follows:
> ./configure --enable-build-Xbae --prefix=/usr/local/lesstif
>
> But "./configure --help" shows:
>
> [...]
> --enable-build-12, build Motif-1.2 compatible version (default)
> --enable-build-20, build Motif-2.0 compatible version (default)
> --enable-build-21, build Motif-2.1 compatible version
> [...]
>
> So I thought, let's go for the default configure + installation;
> that should give the performance with least trouble :).
>
> Rob.
The important flag is --enable-default-20 which should be default in lesstif/CVS.
Running configure on a clean tree should give:
[snip]
checking whether to build a Motif 1.2 compatible version... no
checking whether to build a Motif 2.0 compatible version... yes
checking whether to build a Motif 2.1 compatible version... no
checking whether to install a Motif 2.1 compatible version as default... no
checking whether to install a Motif 2.0 compatible version as default... yes
checking whether to install a Motif 1.2 compatible version as default... no
[snip]
Can you rm config.cache, run the configure command again (as you did)
and look for those lines?
I still don't know whether LessTif or grace configuration stuff fails,
or even something else ...
Can you check the symbolic links in /usr/local/lesstif/lib
that they have a recent timestamp?
And as indicated it should have a
libXm.so -> ../LessTif/Motif2.0/lib/libXm.so
entry.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
