< Please, define a person.
Anna> 

1. So, a person can only be a living human according to you.  A dead human is 
then not a person?
If so, how do you divide his property to his  heirs if he is not a person???

2. A person of importance is  a person. 
Whew, this is a pure  tautology, "a  butter is buttery and made of a butter" 
kind.

3.The composite of characteristics... Ok. In such case, the blue and green and 
purple at 50 F in a liquid form is a person.

About " self". What is Self? A person?  
But, an ant and a wolf also have selves, yet you have stated  at the top that 
it has to be a living human only.

Do you see, that  the terms used here are meaningless, where one term acts as a 
substitute for another, but in the end, no question has been answered?
The only description which makes sense is just this:
a person  in the world of humans is only a human being, dead or alive. The fact 
that it is dead,  cannot erase his history of being a  living person.
By the same reasoning, the fact that an alive  human being is not born yet, 
should not negate his presence as a person. 

To avoid moral dilemnia in libertarian agenda, we should concentrate on the 
issue of justice, not laws.

Anna

  


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: mark robert 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 8:56 PM
  Subject: RE: objective vs subjective Re: [Libertarian] Re: 
Socialism/Capitalism of the A


  1.      A living human. Often used in combination: chairperson;
  spokesperson; salesperson. 
  2.      An individual of specified character: a person of
  importance. 
  3.      The composite of characteristics that make up an
  individual personality; the self. 



    _____  



  Please, define a person.
  Anna



  From: mark robert 
    To: [email protected] 
    Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 8:53 AM
    Subject: RE: objective vs subjective Re: [Libertarian] Re:
  Socialism/Capitalism of the A


    It is. But it is in context to the "person". If I were one of
  two
    Libertarians stuck on a desert island, I would choose to eat a
    sea turtle before my mate. Libertarians do harm everyday: they
    EAT. It's just not to people. Everything is relative, and
  fetuses
    just don't rank quite up to a full person. It's close, but no
    bucket.








    _____  



  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
      
    b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      
    c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to